Neural network models of object recognition can also account for visual search behavior.
Nicholson, D.; Prinz, A. A.
Show abstract
To find an object we are looking for, we must recognize it. Prevailing models of visual search neglect recognition, focusing instead on selective attention mechanisms. These models account for performance limitations that participants exhibit when searching highly simplified stimuli often used in laboratory tasks. However, it is unclear how to apply these models to complex natural images of real-world objects. Deep neural networks (DNN) can be applied to any image, and recently have emerged as state-of-the-art models of object recognition in the primate ventral visual pathway. Using these DNN models, we ask whether object recognition explains limitations on performance across visual search tasks. First, we show that DNNs exhibit a hallmark effect seen when participants search simplified stimuli. Further experiments show this effect results from optimizing for object recognition: DNNs trained from randomly-initialized weights do not exhibit the same performance limitations. Next, we test DNN models of object recognition with natural images, using a dataset where each image has a visual search difficulty score, derived from human reaction times. We find DNN accuracy is inversely correlated with visual search difficulty score. Our findings suggest that to a large extent visual search performance is explained by object recognition.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Constrained sampling from deep generative image models reveals mechanisms of human target detection 98%
- Can deep convolutional neural networks support relational reasoning in the same-different task? 97%
- Target Identification Under High Levels of Amplitude, Size, Orientation and Background Uncertainty 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Three-dimensional shape cues affect human and artificial recognition systems differently 95%
- Small hand-designed convolutional neural networks outperform transfer learning in automated cell shape detection in confluent tissues 93%
- Detection and measurement of butterfly eyespot and spot patterns using convolutional neural networks 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.