Pallidal deep brain stimulation alters cortico-striatal synaptic communication in dystonic hamsters
Heerdegen, M.; Zwar, M.; Franz, D.; Neubert, V.; Plocksties, F.; Niemann, C.; Timmermann, D.; van Rienen, U.; Paap, M.; Perl, S.; Luettig, A.; Richter, A.; Koehling, R.
Show abstract
BackgroundDeep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus internus (GPi) is considered to be the most relevant therapeutic option for patients with severe dystonias, which are thought to arise from a disturbance in striatal control of the GPi, possibly resulting in thalamic disinhibition. The mechanisms of GPi-DBS are far from understood. Hypotheses range from an overall silencing of target nuclei (due to e.g. depolarisation block), via differential alterations in thalamic firing, to disruption of oscillatory activity in the {beta}-range. Although a disturbance of striatal function is thought to play a key role in dystonia, the effects of DBS on cortico-striatal function are unknown. ObjectiveWe hypothesised that DBS, via axonal backfiring, or indirectly via thalamic and cortical coupling, alters striatal network function. We aimed to test this hypothesis in the dtsz-hamster, an animal model of inherited generalised, paroxysmal dystonia. MethodsHamsters (dtsz-dystonic and non-dystonic controls) were bilaterally implanted with stimulation electrodes targeting the entopeduncular nucleus (EPN, equivalent of human GPi). DBS (130 Hz), and sham DBS, were performed in unanaesthetised animals for 3 hours. Synaptic cortico-striatal field potential responses, as well as miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (mEPSC) and firing properties of medium spiny striatal neurons were subsequently recorded in brain slice preparations obtained from these animals immediately after EPN-DBS, to gauge synaptic responsiveness of cortico-striatal projections, their inhibitory control, and striatal neuronal excitability. ResultsDBS increased cortico-striatal responses in slices from control, but not dystonic animals. Inhibitory control of these responses, in turn, was differentially affected: DBS increased inhibitory control in dystonic, and decreased it in healthy tissue. A modulation of presynaptic mechanisms is likely involved, as mEPSC frequency was reduced strongly in dystonic, and less prominently in healthy tissues, while cellular properties of medium-spiny neurons remained unchanged. ConclusionDBS leads to dampening of cortico-striatal communication with restored inhibitory tone.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Impaired Functional Connectivity of Cortico-Amygdala Pathway Can Drive Social Behavior Deficits in Synucleinopathies 93%
- Cell-intrinsic effects of TorsinA(ΔE) disrupt dopamine release in a mouse model of DYT1-TOR1A dystonia 92%
- Cortico-cortical connectivity is normalised by levodopa in tremor-dominant Parkinson’s disease 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Functional abnormalities in the cerebello-thalamic pathways in an animal model of dystonia 95%
- Interrogating basal ganglia circuit function in Parkinson's disease and dystonia 95%
- Serotonergic and dopaminergic neurons in the dorsal raphe are differentially altered in a mouse model for parkinsonism. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Basal ganglia theta power indexes trait anxiety in people with Parkinson’s disease 93%
- Beta-triggered adaptive deep brain stimulation during reaching movement in Parkinson's disease 92%
- Transcriptomic analysis of dystonia-associated genes reveals functional convergence within specific cell types and shared neurobiology with psychiatric disorders 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Closed-loop spinal cord stimulation is superior in restoring locomotion in rodent models of Parkinson's Disease 93%
- Persistent synaptic inhibition of the subthalamic nucleus by high frequency stimulation 93%
- Optogenetic fMRI reveals therapeutic circuits of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.