Biomolecular models of EPI-X4 binding to CXCR4 allow the rational optimization of peptides with therapeutic potential
Sokkar, P.; Harms, M.; Stuerzel, C. M.; Gilg, A.; Kizilsavas, G.; Raasholm, M.; Preising, N.; Wagner, M.; Staendker, L.; Weidinger, G.; Muench, J.; Sanchez-Garcia,, E.
Show abstract
The Endogenous Peptide Inhibitor of CXCR4 (EPI-X4) is a body-own fragment of albumin and specific antagonist of the CXC-motif-chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4). CXCR4 signaling is induced by its sole chemokine ligand CXCL12 and is involved in a plethora of functions including cell homing, differentiation, survival and angiogenesis. Consequently, dysregulation of CXCR4 is involved in a variety of disorders, such as cancer or inflammatory diseases, making CXCR4 an attractive drug target. EPI-X4 and derivatives with increased CXCR4 binding affinities represent promising leads as CXCR4 antagonists and have shown therapeutic activity in mouse models of inflammatory diseases. However, it is currently unclear how EPI-X4 and its derivatives interact with CXCR4. Here, by combining biomolecular simulations with experimental mutagenesis and activity studies we investigated the binding behavior of EPI-X4 to CXCR4 at the molecular level. Our work allowed us to show that the EPI-X4 peptide interacts primarily in the minor pocket of CXCR4 through its N-terminal residues. The biomolecular interactions highlighted by the computational studies are in good agreement with the experimental mutagenesis data. Moreover, we found that the N-terminal seven amino-acids of EPI-X4 (a 16-mer) and its improved derivatives (12-mers) are sufficient for CXCR4 binding, which led to the development of shorter leads with optimized CXCR4 antagonizing properties. Collectively, we here established how EPI-X4 binds to its receptor and used this knowledge for rational drug design. The new peptide variants developed by us are more potent in terms of inhibiting CXCR4-downstream signaling and cancer cell migration, without toxic effects.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Selective Activation of GPCRs: Molecular Dynamics Shows Siponimod Binds but Fails to Activate S1PR2 Unlike S1PR1 96%
- Elucidation of cryptic and allosteric pockets within the SARS-CoV-2 protease 96%
- Allosteric effect of nanobody binding on ligand-specific active states of the β2-Adrenergic Receptor 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of non-proteinogenic amino acid norvaline and proteinogenic valine misincorporation on a secondary structure of a model peptide 95%
- In Silico Identification Of Novel PRFA Inhibitors To Fight Listeriosis: A Virtual Screening And Molecular Dynamics Studies 95%
- Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 Variants Increase the Interactions of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein with ACE2 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Systematic development of peptide inhibitors targeting the CXCL12/HMGB1 interaction 96%
- Structural basis for binding mechanism of human serum albumin complexed with cyclic peptide dalbavancin 95%
- HighPlay:Cyclic Peptide Sequence Design Based on Reinforcement Learning and Protein Structure Prediction 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Designing BH3-mimetic Peptide Inhibitors for the Viral Bcl-2 Homologs A179L and BHRF1: Importance of long-range electrostatic interactions 95%
- How far are we in the rapid prediction of drug resistance caused by kinase mutations? 94%
- Structural Basis for the Improved RNA-Clamping of Amidino-Rocaglates to eIF4A1 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.