Deep learning model fitting for diffusion-relaxometry: a comparative study
Grussu, F.; Battiston, M.; Palombo, M.; Schneider, T.; Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott, C. A. M.; Alexander, D. C.
Show abstract
Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (qMRI) signal model fitting is traditionally performed via non-linear least square (NLLS) estimation. NLLS is slow and its performance can be affected by the presence of different local minima in the fitting objective function. Recently, machine learning techniques, including deep neural networks (DNNs), have been proposed as robust alternatives to NLLS. Here we present a deep learning implementation of qMRI model fitting, which uses DNNs to perform the inversion of the forward signal model. We compare two DNN training strategies, based on two alternative definitions of the loss function, since at present it is not known which definition leads to the most accurate, precise and robust parameter estimation. In strategy 1 we define the loss as the l2-norm of tissue parameter prediction errors, while in strategy 2 as the l2-norm of MRI signal prediction errors. We compare the two approaches on synthetic and 3T in vivo saturation inversion recovery (SIR) diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI data, using a model for joint diffusion-T1 mapping. Strategy 1 leads to lower tissue parameter root mean squared errors (RMSEs) when realistic noise distributions are considered (e.g. Rician vs Gaussian). However, strategy 2 offers lower signal reconstruction RMSE, and allows training to be performed on both synthetic and actual in vivo MRI measurements. In conclusion, both strategies are valid choices for DNN-based fitting. Strategy 2 is more practical, as it does not require pre-computation of reference tissue parameters, but may lead to worse parameter estimation.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Training Data Distribution Significantly Impacts the Estimation of Tissue Microstructure with Machine Learning 98%
- Accelerated multi-shell diffusion MRI with Gaussian process estimated reconstruction of multi-band imaging 97%
- Axisymmetric diffusion kurtosis imaging with Rician bias correction: A simulation study 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Decoding the microstructural properties of white matter using realistic models 97%
- Accuracy and precision in super-resolution MRI: Enabling spherical tensor diffusion encoding at ultra-high b-values and high resolution 97%
- Multi-parametric quantitative spinal cord MRI with unified signal readout and image denoising 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- dStripe: slice artefact correction in diffusion MRI via constrained neural network 97%
- SpinFlowSim: a blood flow simulation framework for histology-informed diffusion MRI microvasculature mapping in cancer 97%
- Deep learning microstructure estimation of developing brains from diffusion MRI: a newborn and fetal study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Cross-modality image translation of 3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging to 7 Tesla using Generative Adversarial Networks 96%
- Domain shifts in infant brain diffusion MRI: Quantification and mitigation for fODF estimation 96%
- Reproducibility and reliability of Free-Water-corrected Diffusion Tensor Imaging of the brain: Revisited 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.