Back

Impact of clade specific mutations on structural fidelity of SARS-CoV-2 proteins

Basu, S.; Mukhopadhyay, S.; Das, R.; Mukhopadhyay, S.; Singh, P. K.; Ganguli, S.

2020-10-20 bioinformatics
10.1101/2020.10.20.347021 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The SARS-CoV-2 is a positive stranded RNA virus with a genome size of ~29.9 kilobase pairs which spans 29 open reading frames. Studies have revealed that the genome encodes about 16 non-structural proteins (nsp), four structural proteins, and six or seven accessory proteins. Based on prevalent knowledge on SARS-CoV and other coronaviruses, functions have been assigned for majority of the proteins. While, researchers across the globe are engrossed in identifying a potential pharmacological intervention to control the viral outbreak, none of the work has come up with new antiviral drugs or vaccines yet. One possible approach that has shown some positive results is by treating infected patients with the plasma collected from convalescent COVID-19 patients. Several vaccines around the world have entered their final trial phase in humans and we expect that these will in time be available for application to worldwide population to combat the disease. In this work we analyse the effect of prevalent mutations in the major pathogenesis related proteins of SARS-COV2 and attempt to pinpoint the effects of those mutations on the structural stability of the proteins. Our observations and analysis direct us to identify that all the major mutations have a negative impact in context of stability of the viral proteins under study and the mutant proteins suffer both structural and functional alterations as a result of the mutations. Our binary scoring scheme identifies L84S mutation in ORF8 as the most disruptive of the mutations under study. We believe that, the virus is under the influence of an evolutionary phenomenon similar to Mullers ratchet where the continuous accumulation of these mutations is making the virus less virulent which may also explain the reduction in fatality rates worldwide.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.