The incubation period of COVID-19: A scoping review and meta-analysis to aid modelling and planning
Banka, P.; Comiskey, C. M.
Show abstract
BackgroundAn accurate estimate of the distribution of the incubation period for COVID-19 is the foundational building block for modelling the spread of the SARS COV2 and the effectiveness of mitigation strategies on affected communities. Initial estimates were based on early infections, the aim of this study was to provide an updated estimate and meta-analysis of the incubation period distribution for COVID-19. MethodsThe review was conducted according to the PRISMA Scoping Review guidelines. Five databases were searched; CINAHL, MEDLINE, PUBMED, EMBASE, ASSIA, and Global Index Medicus for studies published between 1 January 2020 - 27 July 2020. ResultsA total of 1,084 articles were identified through the database searches and 1 article was identified through the reference screening of retrieved articles. After screening 64 articles were included. The studies combined had a sample of 45,151 people. The mean of the incubation periods was 6.71 days with 95% CIs ranging from 1 to 12.4 days. The median was 6 days and IQR ranging from 1.8 to 16.3. The resulting parameters for a Gamma Distribution modelling the incubation period were {Gamma}(, {lambda}) = {Gamma}(2.810,0.419) with mean, = /{lambda}. ConclusionGovernments are planning their strategies on a maximum incubation period of 14 days. While our results are limited to primarily Chinese research studies, the findings highlight the variability in the mean period and the potential for further incubation beyond 14 days. There is an ongoing need for detailed surveillance on the timing of self-isolation periods and related measures protecting communities as incubation periods may be longer.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling the impact of behavioural interventions during pandemics: A systematic review 96%
- Short-term health system responses to epidemics across hard-to-reach areas in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review protocol 93%
- A method of back-calculating the log odds ratio and standard error of the log odds ratio from the reported group-level risk of disease 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Guidelines on reporting and assessing mathematical models for infectious disease dynamics: A scoping review 95%
- Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic: An Overview of Systematic Reviews 92%
- A systematic review of the data, methods and environmental covariates used to map Aedes-borne arbovirus transmission risk 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Vector control for malaria prevention during humanitarian emergencies: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 92%
- Scalability of mobile technology interventions in the prevention and management of HIV among adolescents in low- and middle-income countries: protocol for a systematic review 92%
- The Use of Machine Learning in Occupational Risk Communication for Healthcare Workers – Protocol for scoping review 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.