Back

Differences in cofactor, oxygen and sulfur requirements influence niche adaptation in deep-sea vesicomyid clam symbioses

Young, C. R.; Breusing, C.; Beinart, R.; Perez, M.

2020-10-19 genomics
10.1101/2020.10.19.345819 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Vertical transmission of bacterial endosymbionts is accompanied by virtually irreversible gene loss that can provide insights into adaptation to divergent ecological niches. While patterns of genome reduction have been well described in some terrestrial symbioses, they are less understood in marine systems where vertical transmission is relatively rare. The association between deep-sea vesicomyid clams and chemosynthetic Gammaproteobacteria is one example of maternally inherited symbioses in the ocean. Differences in nitrogen and sulfur physiology between the two dominant symbiont groups, Ca. Ruthia and Ca. Vesicomyosocius, have been hypothesized to influence niche exploitation, which likely affects gene content evolution in these symbionts. However, genomic data are currently limited to confirm this assumption. In the present study we sequenced and compared 11 vesicomyid symbiont genomes with existing assemblies for Ca. Vesicomyosocius okutanii and Ca. Ruthia magnifica. Our analyses indicate that the two vesicomyid symbiont groups have a common core genome related to chemosynthetic metabolism, but differ in their potential for nitrate respiration and flexibility to environmental sulfide concentrations. Moreover, Ca. Vesicomyosocius and Ca. Ruthia have different enzymatic requirements for cobalamin and nickel and show contrasting capacities to acquire foreign genetic material. Tests for site-specific positive selection in metabolic candidate genes imply that the observed physiological differences are adaptive and thus likely correspond to ecological niches available to each symbiont group. These findings highlight the role of niche differentiation in creating divergent paths of reductive genome evolution in vertically transmitted symbionts.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.4%
2
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.7%
3
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 1%
7.0%
4
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.0%
6
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
7
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 43%
3.0%
9
Environmental Microbiology Reports
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
10
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 34%
1.5%
12
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
13
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
14
Journal of Phycology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
15
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.3%
16
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.1%
17
microLife
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
18
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
21
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
22
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
23
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
24
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.5%