Back

Pore constrictions in intervessel pit membranes reduce the risk of embolism spreading in angiosperm xylem

Kaack, L.; Weber, M.; Isasa, E.; Karimi, Z.; Li, S.; Pereira, L.; Trabi, C. L.; Zhang, Y.; Schenk, H. J.; Schuldt, B.; Schmidt, V.; Jansen, S.

2020-10-19 plant biology
10.1101/2020.10.19.345413 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIEmbolism spreading in angiosperm xylem occurs via mesoporous pit membranes between vessels. Here, we investigate how the size of pore constrictions in pit membranes is related to pit membrane thickness and embolism resistance. C_LIO_LIIn three models, pit membranes are modelled as multiple layers to investigate how pit membrane thickness and the number of intervessel pits per vessel determine pore constriction sizes, the probability of encountering large pores, and air-seeding. These estimations were complemented by measurements of pit membrane thickness, embolism resistance, and number of intervessel pits per vessel (n = 31, 31, and 20 species, respectively). C_LIO_LIConstriction sizes in pores decreased with increasing pit membrane thickness, which agreed with the measured relationship between pit membrane thickness and embolism resistance. The number of pits per vessel affected constriction size and embolism resistance much less than pit membrane thickness. A strong relationship between estimated air-seeding pressures and measured embolism resistance was observed. C_LIO_LIPore constrictions provide a mechanistic explanation why pit membrane thickness determines embolism resistance, and suggest that hydraulic safety can be uncoupled from hydraulic efficiency. Although embolism spreading remains puzzling and encompasses more than pore constriction sizes, angiosperms are unlikely to have leaky pit membranes, which enables tensile transport of water. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Tree Physiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
2
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.9%
3
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
12.1%
4
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.2%
7
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
8
in silico Plants
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 28%
2.0%
10
Quantitative Plant Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 43%
1.7%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.7%
13
Nature Plants
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
14
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
15
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.3%
17
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.1%
18
AoB PLANTS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
19
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.7%
21
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.7%
22
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
23
Annals of Botany
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%