Allele-specific collateral and fitness effects determine the dynamics of fluoroquinolone-resistance evolution
Liakopoulos, A.; Aulin, L. B. S.; Buffoni, M.; van Hasselt, J. G. C.; Rozen, D. E.
Show abstract
Collateral sensitivity (CS), which arises when resistance to one antibiotic increases sensitivity towards other antibiotics, offers novel treatment opportunities to constrain or reverse the evolution of antibiotic-resistance. The applicability of CS-informed treatments remains uncertain, in part because we lack an understanding of the generality of CS effects for different resistance mutations, singly or in combination. Here we address this issue in the Gram-positive pathogen Streptococcus pneumoniae by measuring collateral and fitness effects of clinically relevant gyrA and parC alleles, and their combinations, that confer resistance to fluoroquinolones. We integrated these results in a mathematical model which allowed us to evaluate how different in silico combination treatments impact the dynamics of resistance evolution. We identified common and conserved CS effects of different gyrA and parC alleles; however, the spectrum of collateral effects was unique for each allele or allelic pair. This indicated that allelic identity can impact the evolutionary dynamics of resistance evolution during monotreatment and combination treatment. Our model simulations, which included the experimentally derived antibiotic susceptibilities and fitness effects, and antibiotic specific pharmacodynamics, revealed that both collateral and fitness effects impact the population dynamics of resistance evolution. Overall, we provide evidence that allelic identity and interactions can have a pronounced impact on collateral effects to different antibiotics and suggest that these need to be considered in models examining CS-based therapies. SignificanceA promising strategy to overcome the evolution of antibiotic resistant bacteria is to use collateral sensitivity-informed antibiotic treatments that rely on cycling or mixing of antibiotics, such that that resistance towards one antibiotic confers increased sensitivity to the other. Here, focusing on multi-step fluoroquinolone resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae, we show that antibiotic-resistance induces diverse collateral responses whose magnitude and direction are determined by allelic identity. Using mathematical simulations, we show that these effects can be exploited via combination treatment regimens to suppress the de novo emergence of resistance during treatment.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A large-scale comparison shows that genetic changes causing antibiotic resistance in experimentally evolved Pseudomonas aeruginosa predict those in naturally evolved bacteria 95%
- Weakest link dynamics predict apparent antibiotic interactions in a model cross-feeding community. 95%
- Transcriptomics reveals how minocycline-colistin synergy overcomes antibiotic resistance in multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- In vitro exposure to non-antipseudomonal antibiotics (NAPA) induces Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistance to antipseudomonal antibiotics (APA) 94%
- Occurrence of cross-resistance and beta-lactam seesaw effect in glycopeptide, lipopeptide, and lipoglycopeptide-resistant MRSA correlates with membrane phosphatidylglycerol levels 93%
- Concurrence of Porin Loss and Modular Amplification of β-Lactamase Encoding Genes Drives Carbapenem Resistance in a Cohort of Recurrent Enterobacterales Bacteremia 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Phage-Antibiotic Synergy Is Driven By A Unique Combination Of Antibacterial Mechanism Of Action And Stoichiometry 95%
- Critical role of growth medium for detecting drug interactions in Gram-negative bacteria that model in vivo responses 95%
- The fitness landscape of TEM-1 β-lactamase is stratified and inverted by sublethal concentrations of cefotaxime 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.