Modelling the dispersion of SARS-CoV-2 on a dynamic network graph
Bryant, P.; Elofsson, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundWhen modelling the dispersion of an epidemic using R0, one only considers the average number of individuals each infected individual will infect. However, we know from extensive studies of social networks that there is significant variation in the number of connections and thus social contacts each individual has. Individuals with more social contacts are more likely to attract and spread infection. These individuals are likely the drivers of the epidemic, so-called superspreaders. When many superspreaders are immune, it becomes more difficult for the disease to spread, as the connectedness of the social network dramatically decreases. If one assumes all individuals being equally connected and thus as likely to spread disease as in a SIR model, this is not true. MethodsTo account for the impact of social network structure on epidemic development, we model the dispersion of SARS-CoV-2 on a dynamic preferential attachment graph which changes appearance proportional to observed mobility changes. We sample a serial interval distribution that determines the probability of dispersion for all infected nodes each day. We model the dispersion in different age groups using age-specific infection fatality rates. We vary the infection probabilities in different age groups and analyse the outcome. ResultsThe impact of movement on network dynamics plays a crucial role in the spread of infections. We find that higher movement results in higher spread due to an increased probability of new connections being made within a social network. We show that saturation in the dispersion can be reached much earlier on a preferential attachment graph compared to spread on a random graph, which is more similar to estimations using R0. ConclusionsWe provide a novel method for modelling epidemics by using a dynamic network structure related to observed mobility changes. The social network structure plays a crucial role in epidemic development, something that is often overlooked.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling digital and manual contact tracing for COVID-19 Are low uptakes and missed contacts deal-breakers? 97%
- Increasing efficacy of contact-tracing applications by user referrals and stricter quarantining 97%
- Dynamical SPQEIR model assesses the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19 epidemic outbreaks 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Model Based Estimation of the SARS-CoV-2 Immunization Level in Austria and Consequences for Herd Immunity Effects 97%
- Extended compartmental model for modeling COVID-19 epidemic in Slovenia 96%
- Ranking the Effectiveness of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions to Counter COVID-19 in UK Universities with Vaccinated Population 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysis of mitigation of Covid-19 outbreaks in workplaces and schools by hybrid telecommuting 97%
- Novel travel time aware metapopulation models and multi-layer waning immunity for late-phase epidemic and endemic scenarios 96%
- Appropriate relaxation of non-pharmaceutical interventions minimizes the risk of a resurgence in SARS-CoV-2 infections in spite of the Delta variant 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The trade-off between mobility and vaccination for COVID-19 control: a metapopulation modeling approach 96%
- Tracing and testing multiple generations of contacts to COVID-19 cases: cost-benefit tradeoffs 96%
- Nowcasting and Forecasting COVID-19 Waves: The Recursive and Stochastic Nature of Transmission 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.