Fundamental limits on the rate of bacterial growth
Belliveau, N. M.; Chure, G. D.; Hueschen, C. L.; Garcia, H. G.; Kondev, J.; Fisher, D. S.; Theriot, J. A.; Phillips, R.
Show abstract
Recent years have seen an experimental deluge interrogating the relationship between bacterial growth rate, cell size, and protein content, quantifying the abundance of proteins across growth conditions with unprecedented resolution. However, we still lack a rigorous understanding of what sets the scale of these quantities and when protein abundances should (or should not) depend on growth rate. Here, we seek to quantitatively understand this relationship across a collection of Escherichia coli proteomic data covering {approx} 4000 proteins and 36 growth rates. We estimate the basic requirements for steady-state growth by considering key processes in nutrient transport, cell envelope biogenesis, energy generation, and the central dogma. From these estimates, ribosome biogenesis emerges as a primary determinant of growth rate. We expand on this assessment by exploring a model of proteomic regulation as a function of the nutrient supply, revealing a mechanism that ties cell size and growth rate to ribosomal content.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Transcriptional competition biases the effects of second messengers in E. coli 95%
- Global transcription regulation revealed from dynamical correlations in time-resolved single-cell RNA-sequencing 94%
- Transcriptional kinetic synergy: a complex landscape revealed by integrating modelling and synthetic biology 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Promoters adopt distinct dynamic manifestations depending on transcription factor context 93%
- Analysis of proteome adaptation reveals a key role of the bacterial envelope in starvation survival 93%
- Evaluating the Simple Arrhenius Equation for the Temperature Dependence of Complex Developmental Processes 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.