Back

Understanding the potential benefits of adaptive therapy for metastatic melanoma

Kim, E.; Brown, J. S.; Eroglu, Z.; Anderson, A. R. A.

2020-10-17 cancer biology
10.1101/2020.10.16.343269 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Adaptive therapy is an evolution-based treatment approach that aims to maintain tumor volume by employing minimum effective drug doses or timed drug holidays. For successful adaptive therapy outcomes, it is critical to find the optimal timing of treatment switch points. Mathematical models are ideal tools to facilitate adaptive therapy dosing and switch time points. We developed two different mathematical models to examine interactions between drug-sensitive and resistant cells in a tumor. The first model assumes genetically fixed drug-sensitive and resistant populations that compete for limited resources. Resistant cell growth is inhibited by sensitive cells. The second model considers phenotypic switching between drug-sensitive and resistant cells. We calibrated each model to fit melanoma patient biomarker changes over time and predicted patient-specific adaptive therapy schedules. Overall, the models predict that adaptive therapy would have delayed time to progression by 6-25 months compared to continuous therapy with dose rates of 6%-74% relative to continuous therapy. We identified predictive factors driving the clinical time gained by adaptive therapy. The first model predicts 6-20 months gained from continuous therapy when the initial population of sensitive cells is large enough, and when the sensitive cells have a large competitive effect on resistant cells. The second model predicts 20-25 months gained from continuous therapy when the switching rate from resistant to sensitive cells is high and the growth rate of sensitive cells is low. This study highlights that there is a range of potential patient specific benefits of adaptive therapy, depending on the underlying mechanism of resistance, and identifies tumor specific parameters that modulate this benefit.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
22.7%
2
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.8%
3
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
92 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.4%
5
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
6
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.8%
7
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.5%
8
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.2%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
10
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.7%
11
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.4%
14
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
15
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
16
Cancer Immunology Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
17
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.1%
18
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
20
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
21
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
22
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
25
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
75 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
Physical Biology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
27
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
28
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
29
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%