Single cell transcriptome sequencing on the Nanopore platform with ScNapBar
Wang, Q.; Boenigk, S.; Boehm, V.; Gehring, N. H.; Altmueller, J.; Dieterich, C.
Show abstract
The current ecosystem of single cell RNA-seq platforms is rapidly expanding, but robust solutions for single cell and single molecule full-length RNA sequencing are virtually absent. A high-throughput solution that covers all aspects is necessary to study the complex life of mRNA on the single cell level. The Nanopore platform offers long read sequencing and can be integrated with the popular single cell sequencing method on the 10x Chromium platform. However, the high error-rate of Nanopore reads poses a challenge in downstream processing (e.g. for cell barcode assignment). We propose a solution to this particular problem by using a hybrid sequencing approach on Nanopore and Illumina platforms. Our software ScNapBar enables cell barcode assignment with high accuracy, especially if sequencing saturation is low. ScNapBar uses unique molecular identifier (UMI) or Naive Bayes probabilistic approaches in the barcode assignment, depending on the available Illumina sequencing depth. We have benchmarked the two approaches on simulated and real Nanopore datasets. We further applied ScNapBar to pools of cells with an active or a silenced non-sense mediated RNA decay pathway. Our Nanopore read assignment distinguishes the respective cell populations and reveals characteristic nonsense-mediated mRNA decay events depending on cell status.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated quality control and cell identification of droplet-based single-cell data using dropkick 97%
- Highly accurate reference and method selection for universal cross-dataset cell type annotation with CAMUS 96%
- Dynamic Analysis of Alternative Polyadenylation from Single-Cell RNA-Seq(scDaPars) Reveals Cell Subpopulations Invisible to Gene Expression Analysis 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.