A drug-screening platform based on organotypic cultures identifies vulnerabilities to prevent local relapse and treat established brain metastasis
Zhu, L.; Yebra, N.; Miarka, L.; Hernandez-Encinas, E.; Blanco-Aparicio, C.; Martinez, S.; Soffietti, R.; Bertero, L.; Cassoni, P.; Weiss, T.; Munoz, J.; Sepulveda, J. M.; Perez-Nunez, A.; Hernandez-Lain, A.; Ruano, Y.; Toldos, O.; Caleiras, E.; Megias, D.; Grana-Castro, O.; Nör, C.; Taylor, M. D.; Cusso, L.; Desco, M.; Weller, M.; Pastor, J.; Valiente, M.
Show abstract
Exclusion of brain metastases from clinical trials is a major cause of the limited therapeutic options for this growing population of cancer patients. Here, we report a medium-throughput drug-screening platform (METPlatform) based on organotypic cultures that allows to evaluate inhibitors against metastases growing in situ. By applying this approach to brain metastasis, we identified several hits from a library of FDA approved inhibitors and others being tested in clinical trials. A blood-brain barrier permeable HSP90 inhibitor showed high potency against mouse and human brain metastases at clinically relevant stages of the disease, including a novel model of local relapse after neurosurgery. Furthermore, in situ proteomic analysis applied to organotypic cultures with metastases treated with the chaperone inhibitor revealed novel biomarkers in human brain metastasis and actionable mechanisms of resistance. Our work validates METPlatform as a potent resource for metastasis research integrating drug-screening and unbiased omic approaches that is fully compatible with human samples. We envision that METPlatform could be established as a clinically relevant strategy to personalize the management of metastatic disease in the brain and elsewhere. SummarySystemic spread of cancer continues to be the key aspect associated with lethality. In this publication, Zhu et al. describes a drug-screening platform specifically designed to study vulnerabilities of metastasis when colonizing secondary organs and demonstrates its value in difficult-to-treat brain metastasis using new models and patient-derived samples.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploiting a metabolic vulnerability in brain tumour stem cells using a brain-penetrant drug with safe profile 94%
- Discovery of oncogenic ROS1 missense mutations with sensitivity to tyrosine kinase inhibitors 93%
- Targeting the SHP2 phosphatase promotes vascular damage and inhibition of tumor growth 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Functional diagnostics using fresh uncultured lung tumor cells to guide personalized treatments 93%
- Bexmarilimab-induced macrophage activation leads to treatment benefit in solid tumors: the phase I/II first-in-human MATINS trial 92%
- Hypoxia-Sensing CAR T-Cells Provide Safety and Efficacy in Treating Solid Tumors 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prolonging lung cancer response to EGFR inhibition by targeting the selective advantage of resistant cells 95%
- Anti-CSF-1R therapy with combined immuno- chemotherapy coordinate an adaptive immune response to eliminate macrophage enriched Triple Negative Breast Cancers 95%
- Decoding molecular programs in melanoma brain metastases 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Matrix structure and microenvironment dynamics correlate with chemotherapy response in ovarian cancer 93%
- A Non-genetic Mechanism for Chemoresistance in Lung Cancer: The Role of Integrin β4/Paxillin Axis 93%
- NDC80 status pinpoints mitotic kinase inhibitors as emerging therapeutic options in clear cell renal cell carcinoma 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inhibition of tumor growth by a novel engineered chimeric toxin that cleaves activated mutant and wild-type RAS 95%
- A Targeted Combination Therapy Achieves Effective Pancreatic Cancer Regression And Prevents Tumor Resistance 95%
- Development of an orally bioavailable mSWI/SNF ATPase degrader and acquired mechanisms of resistance in prostate cancer 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.