Massive intron gain in the most intron-rich eukaryotes is driven by introner-like transposable elements of unprecedented diversity and flexibility
Roy, S. W.; Gozashti, L.; Bowser, B.; Weinstein, B. N.; Larue, G.
Show abstract
Spliceosomal introns, which interrupt nuclear genes and are removed from RNA transcripts by machinery termed spliceosomes, are ubiquitous features of eukaryotic nuclear genes [1]. Patterns of spliceosomal intron evolution are complex, with some lineages exhibiting virtually no intron creation while others experience thousands of intron gains [2-5]. One possibility is that this punctate phylogenetic distribution is explained by intron creation by Introner-Like Elements (ILEs), transposable elements capable of creating introns, with only those lineages harboring ILEs undergoing massive intron gain [6-10]. However, ILEs have been reported in only four lineages. Here we study intron evolution in dinoflagellates. The remarkable fragmentation of nuclear genes by spliceosomal introns reaches its apex in dinoflagellates, which have some twenty introns per gene [11,12]. Despite this, almost nothing is known about the molecular and evolutionary mechanisms governing dinoflagellate intron evolution. We reconstructed intron evolution in five dinoflagellate genomes, revealing a dynamic history of intron loss and gain. ILEs are found in 4/5 studied species. In one species, Polarella glacialis, we find an unprecedented diversity of ILEs, with ILE insertion leading to creation of some 12,253 introns, and with 15 separate families of ILEs accounting for at least 100 introns each. These ILE families range in mobilization mechanism, mechanism of intron creation, and flexibility of mechanism of intron creation. Comparison within and between ILE families provides evidence that biases in so-called intron phase, the distribution of introns relative to codon periodicity, are driven by ILE insertion site requirements [9,13,14]. Finally, we find evidence for multiple additional transformations of the spliceosomal system in dinoflagellates, including widespread loss of ancestral introns, and alterations in required, tolerated and favored splice motifs. These results reveal unappreciated intron creating elements diversity and spliceosomal evolutionary capacity, and suggest complex evolutionary dependencies shaping genome structures.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Dynamic evolution of euchromatic satellites on the X chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster and the simulans clade 94%
- Mitochondrial genomes in Perkinsus decode conserved frameshifts in all genes 92%
- Diversity in recombination hotspot characteristics and gene structure shape fine-scale recombination patterns in plant genomes 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Role of Diversity-Generating Retroelements for Regulatory Pathway Tuning in Cyanobacteria 92%
- Mitochondrial genomes of two parasitic Cuscuta species lack clear evidence of horizontal gene transfer and retain unusually fragmented ccmFC genes 91%
- Daphnia magna egg piRNA cluster expression profiles change as mothers age. 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Whole-genome sequence of Potamopyrgus antipodarum: a model system for the maintenance of sexual reproduction reveals a recent whole-genome duplication 94%
- Ribosomal intergenic spacers are filled with transposon remnants 92%
- Independent transposon exaptation is a widespread mechanism of shadow enhancer evolution in the mammalian genome 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Double-stranded DNA viruses may serve as vectors for horizontal transfer of intron-generating transposons 94%
- Mu Transposition in the Absence of the Target-capture Protein MuB Reveals New Roles of MuB in Target Immunity and Target Selection, and Redraws the Boundaries of the Insular Ter Region of E. coli 93%
- Migrators Within Migrators: Exploring Transposable Element Dynamics in the Monarch Butterfly, Danaus plexippus 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.