Back
Top 17%
30.2%
#1
6.8%
Top 34%
6.8%
Top 5%
5.3%
Top 1%
4.4%
Top 38%
4.1%
Top 11%
2.9%
Top 9%
2.3%
Top 5%
2.0%
Top 2%
2.0%
Top 1%
2.0%
Top 7%
1.6%
Top 14%
1.4%
Top 3%
1.4%
Top 9%
1.4%
Top 2%
1.4%
Top 8%
1.2%
Top 6%
1.2%
Top 22%
1.2%
Top 3%
1.0%
Top 0.8%
0.8%
Top 7%
0.5%
How to remove the testing bias in CoV-2 statistics
2020-10-16
epidemiology
Title + abstract only
View on medRxiv
Show abstract
BACKGROUNDPublic health measures and private behaviour are based on reported numbers of SARS-CoV-2 infections. Some argue that testing influences the confirmed number of infections. OBJECTIVES/METHODSDo time series on reported infections and the number of tests allow one to draw conclusions about actual infection numbers? A SIR model is presented where the true numbers of susceptible, infectious and removed individuals are unobserved. Testing is also modelled. RESULTSOfficial confirmed infecti...
Predicted journal destinations
1
PLOS ONE
1737 training papers
2
Epidemiology and Infection
80 training papers
3
Scientific Reports
701 training papers
4
Frontiers in Public Health
135 training papers
5
Infectious Disease Modelling
50 training papers
6
BMJ Open
553 training papers
7
BMC Public Health
148 training papers
8
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
116 training papers
9
BMC Infectious Diseases
110 training papers
10
Eurosurveillance
77 training papers
11
Royal Society Open Science
49 training papers
12
Epidemics
96 training papers
13
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
115 training papers
14
BMC Medical Research Methodology
41 training papers
15
PLOS Computational Biology
141 training papers
16
PeerJ
46 training papers
17
International Journal of Epidemiology
65 training papers
18
American Journal of Epidemiology
54 training papers
19
BMC Medicine
155 training papers
20
JMIRx Med
29 training papers
21
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
18 training papers
22
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
54 training papers