Back

Generalized paradoxical effects in excitatory/inhibitory networks

Miller, K. D.; Palmigiano, A.

2020-10-13 neuroscience
10.1101/2020.10.13.336727 bioRxiv
Show abstract

An inhibition-stabilized network (ISN) is a network of excitatory and inhibitory cells at a stable fixed point of firing rates for a given input, for which the excitatory subnetwork would be unstable if inhibitory rates were frozen at their fixed point values. It has been shown that in a low-dimensional model (one unit per neuronal subtype) of an ISN with a single excitatory and single inhibitory cell type, the inhibitory unit shows a "paradoxical" response, lowering (raising) its steady-state firing rate in response to addition to it of excitatory (inhibitory) input. This has been generalized to an ISN with multiple inhibitory cell types: if input is given only to inhibitory cells, the steady-state inhibition received by excitatory cells changes paradoxically, that is, it decreases (increases) if the steady-state excitatory firing rates decrease (increase). We generalize these analyses of paradoxical effects to low-dimensional networks with multiple cell types of both excitatory and inhibitory neurons. The analysis depends on the connectivity matrix of the network linearized about a given fixed point, and its eigenvectors or "modes". We show the following: (1) A given cell type shows a paradoxical change in steady-state rate in response to input it receives, if and only if the network with that cell type omitted has an odd number of unstable modes. Excitatory neurons can show paradoxical responses when there are two or more inhibitory subtypes. (2) More generally, if the cell types are divided into two nonoverlapping subsets A and B, then subset B has an odd (even) number of modes that show paradoxical response if and only if subset A has an odd (even) number of unstable modes. (3) The net steady-state inhibition received by any unstable mode of the excitatory subnetwork will change paradoxically, i.e. in the same direction as the change in amplitude of that mode. In particular, this means that a sufficient condition to determine that a network is an ISN is if, in response to an input only to inhibitory cells, the firing rates of and inhibition received by all excitatory cell types all change in the same direction. This in turn will be true if all E cells and all inhibitory cell types that connect to E cells change their firing rates in the same direction.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biological Cybernetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.6%
2
Neural Computation
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.4%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 5%
7.1%
4
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
5
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 23%
5.3%
6
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.3%
7
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of Mathematical Biology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
9
Neural Networks
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
10
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
11
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
12
Mathematical Biosciences
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
13
Network Neuroscience
126 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
14
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
15
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.1%
16
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
17
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
92 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
18
Hippocampus
56 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 31%
1.5%
20
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
21
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
22
Neuroscience
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
24
Physical Review E
112 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.6%