Back

Eucalyptus plantations in temperate grasslands: responses of taxonomic and functional diversity of plant communities to environmental changes

Pairo, P. E.; Rodriguez, E.; Bellocq, M. I.; Acenolaza, P.

2020-10-12 ecology
10.1101/2020.10.12.334011 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding how human land-uses impact on local communities is required to implement management and conservational policies and practices. Tree plantations have become one of the fastest-growing land uses in recent decades and their impact on biodiversity was evaluated mainly at the taxonomic level. Our aim was to analyze the effects of changes in environmental drivers along the 12 years eucalypt plantations chronosequence on alfa, beta, taxonomic and functional diversity of understory plant communities. We selected nine plantation ages with three replicates per age and three protected grasslands as reference habitat. At each replicate, we established three plots to measure plant species cover and environmental variables, which are expected to change with plantation age. Results showed that species richness and all diversity indices significantly declined with increasing plantation age. Canopy cover, soil pH, and leaf litter were the most important drivers that explained the decline in taxonomic and functional diversity of plants through the forest plantation. Based on the Path analyses results, canopy cover had an indirect relationship with plant functional diversity mediated by leaf litter, soil pH and plant species richness. The results of the association between functional traits and environmental variables have revealed that high dispersal potential, annual, barochorous, and zoochorous plant species were the functional traits more affected by the eucalypt plantations. Given that leaf litter was negatively associated with all diversity facets, we recommend reducing their accumulation within eucalypt plantation to enhance biodiversity conservation and the provision of pampean grassland ecosystem functions.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Forest Ecology and Management
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.5%
2
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.5%
3
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.5%
4
Journal of Ecology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.4%
5
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.2%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.0%
7
Ecological Indicators
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
8
Oecologia
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
9
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
10
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
11
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
12
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.3%
13
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
14
Journal of Environmental Management
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
15
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
16
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
17
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
18
Biotropica
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
19
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
20
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
21
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.3%
22
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.1%
23
Ecological Monographs
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
24
Journal of Biogeography
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
25
Environmental DNA
56 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
26
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
Ecological Informatics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
28
Landscape Ecology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
29
Diversity and Distributions
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
30
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%