Back

Altered glutamine metabolism of cultured fibroblasts predicts severity of cardiac dysfunction in the dilated cardiomyopathy with ataxia syndrome (DCMA), a mitochondrial cardiomyopathy

King, M. A.; Heger, K.; Khan, A.; Sinasac, D.; Huttlin, E. L.; Greenway, S. C.; Lewis, I. A.

2020-10-11 cell biology
10.1101/2020.10.11.334938 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Dilated cardiomyopathy with ataxia (DCMA) syndrome is a rare mitochondrial disorder caused by mutations in the poorly understood DNAJC19 gene. The clinical presentation of DCMA is very diverse with symptoms ranging from mild cardiac dysfunction to intractable heart failure leading to death in early childhood. Although several lines of evidence indicate that DCMA symptoms are linked to mitochondrial function, the molecular underpinnings of this disease are unclear and there is no way to predict which patients are at risk for developing life-threatening symptoms. To address this we developed a metabolic flux assay for assessing the metabolic function of mitochondria in dermal fibroblasts derived from DCMA patients. Using this approach we discovered that fibroblasts from patients with DCMA showed elevated glutamine uptake, increased glutamate and ammonium secretion, and elevated lactate production when compared to controls. Moreover, the magnitude of these metabolic perturbations was closely correlated with patient cardiac dysfunction. This clinical/metabolic correlation was confirmed in a second blinded cohort of DCMA fibroblasts. Moreover, our metabolic flux diagnostic strategy correctly differentiated severe from mild DCMA cases with only one incorrect patient classification (positive predictive value 1.0 and negative predictive value 0.83). These findings suggest that glutamine catabolism is abnormal in DCMA and may serve as an early biomarker for predicting clinical progression. One Sentence SummaryAlterations in glutamine and lactate metabolism in patient-derived dermal fibroblasts are associated with the severity of cardiomyopathy in DCMA.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.