Safely Reopening K-12 Schools During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Shelley, C. D.; Chadwick, P. S.; Manore, C.; Del Valle, S. Y.
Show abstract
Early school closures were a consistent, nationwide response to the COVID-19 pandemic in mid-March due to the role that children play in spreading influenza. This left us with limited understanding of COVID-19 transmission in children until several states reopened schools for the 2020-2021 school year. While early school closures were likely beneficial in protecting children in the initial stages of the pandemic in the U.S., long-term closures pose significant cumulative effects in children who rely on schools for instruction and additional social services, and for parents who need to balance work and childcare obligations. Reopening schools safely is a high priority for many interested stakeholders. Proposed in-person school reopening plans include traditional, 100% school capacity, five days per week instruction, hybrid scenarios with reduced in-person instruction and virtual learning, and various reduced school capacity schedules with non-pharmaceutical interventions in place. To assess the potential impacts of different reopening plans, we created a modified SIR-type transmission model that captures multiple known pathways of COVID-19 transmission in a 100,000-person community. Our results show that plans that utilize consecutive days in school and divide students into separated smaller cohorts who attend school together, as well as plans that emphasize distance learning, are better able to suppress disease spread and reduce risk from an introduced infective into the community. Plans with more consecutive school days are protective for both the schoolchildren and surrounding community by acting to separate the larger intermixing population into smaller intermixing subpopulations. The "Five-Day Switch" plan, which separates students into two cohorts, each of whom attend in-person learning for five consecutive days followed by five days of distance learning, best captures these protective attributes. All modeled plans assumed initially disease-free communities and that childrens interactions with the community are greatly reduced during instructional days, both for in-person and distance learning.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Using an Agent-Based Model to Assess K-12 School Reopenings Under Different COVID-19 Spread Scenarios – United States, School Year 2020/21 96%
- Limited impact of contact tracing in a University setting for COVID-19 due to asymptomatic transmission and social distancing 95%
- Assessing the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on SARS-CoV-2 transmission in Belgium by means of an extended SEIQRD model and public mobility data 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- An examination of school reopening strategies during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic 96%
- In the long shadow of our best intentions: model-based assessment of the consequences of school reopening during the COVID-19 pandemic 96%
- Community structured model for vaccine strategies to control COVID19 spread: a mathematical study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Preventing a cluster from becoming a new wave in settings with zero community COVID-19 cases 96%
- Modelling testing and response strategies for COVID-19 outbreaks in remote Australian Aboriginal communities 96%
- Comparing alternative cholera vaccination strategies in Maela refugee camp using a transmission model 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.