Back

Detection of a bedaquiline / clofazimine resistance reservoir in Mycobacterium tuberculosis predating the antibiotic era

van Dorp, L.; Nimmo, C.; Torres Ortiz, A.; Pang, J.; Acman, M.; Tan, C. C.; Millard, J.; Padayatchi, N.; Grant, A.; O'Donnell, M. R.; Pym, A.; Brynildsrud, O. B.; Eldholm, V.; Grandjean, L.; Didelot, X.; Balloux, F.

2020-10-07 genomics
10.1101/2020.10.06.328799 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Drug resistance in tuberculosis (TB) poses a major ongoing challenge to public health. The recent inclusion of bedaquiline into TB drug regimens has improved treatment outcomes, but this advance is threatened by the emergence of strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) resistant to bedaquiline. Clinical bedaquiline resistance is most frequently conferred by off-target resistance-associated variants (RAVs) in the mmpR5 gene (Rv0678), the regulator of an efflux pump, which can also confer cross-resistance to clofazimine, another TB drug. We compiled a dataset of 3,682 Mtb genomes, including 150 carrying variants in mmpR5 that have been associated to borderline (henceforth intermediate) or confirmed resistance to bedaquiline. We identified eight cases where RAVs were present in the genomes of strains collected prior to the use of bedaquiline in TB treatment regimes. Phylogenetic reconstruction points to multiple emergence events and circulation of RAVs in mmpR5, some estimated to predate the introduction of bedaquiline. However, epistatic interactions can complicate bedaquiline drug-susceptibility prediction from genetic sequence data. Indeed, in one clade of isolates where the RAV Ile67fs is estimated to have emerged prior to the antibiotic era, co-occurrence of mutations in mmpL5 are found to neutralise bedaquiline resistance. The presence of a pre-existing reservoir of Mtb strains carrying bedaquiline RAVs prior to its clinical use augments the need for rapid drug susceptibility testing and individualised regimen selection to safeguard the use of bedaquiline in TB care and control.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.