Lexical parafoveal previewing predicts reading speed
Pan, Y.; Frisson, S.; Jensen, O.
Show abstract
While reading is an essential human skill, many of the neuronal mechanisms supporting reading are not well understood. In spite of the reduced visual acuity, parafoveal information plays a critical role in natural reading1; however, it is strongly debated whether words are previewed parafoveally at the lexical level2-9. This is a key dispute for competing models on reading and of great significance since lexical retrieval is important for guiding eye movements. We found evidence for parafoveal previewing at the lexical level by combining a novel rapid invisible frequency tagging (RIFT)10, 11 approach with magnetoencephalography (MEG) and eye-tracking. In a silent reading task, target words of either low or high lexical frequency were tagged (flickered) subliminally at 60 Hz. The tagging response measured when fixating on the pre-target word reflected parafoveal previewing of the target word. We observed a stronger tagging response as early as 100 ms following fixations on pre-target words that were followed by target words of low compared with high lexical frequency. Moreover, the difference in tagging response with respect to target lexicality predicted individual reading speed. Our findings demonstrate that reading unfolds in the fovea and parafovea simultaneously to support fluent reading.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Fast hierarchical processing of orthographic and semantic parafoveal information during natural reading 97%
- Neural attentional-filter mechanisms of listening success in middle-aged and older individuals 95%
- Confirmation Bias through Selective Readout of Information Encoded in Human Parietal Cortex 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Linguistic processing of task-irrelevant speech at a Cocktail Party 96%
- Differential destinations, dynamics, and functions of high- and low-order features in the feedback signal during object processing 96%
- Non-feature-specific elevated responses and feature-specific backward replay in human brain induced by visual sequence exposure 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.