Back

Decolonizing Psocopteran Systematics: Holarctic Lineages Cannot Inform Diversity and Evolution in Tropics

Sarria-Rodriguez, V.; Gonzalez-Obando, R.; Rivera-Franco, N.; Cardenas-Henao, H.; Roman-Palacios, C.

2020-10-04 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2020.10.02.324277 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Despite tropical psocids comprise ~60% of species diversity within the Psocidae (Insecta, Psocodea), previous studies on the Psocidae phylogeny have poorly sampled tropical species (<40% species in trees). Here we discuss the evolution and systematics of the Psocidae based on the most comprehensive species-level sampling of the Psocidae. We sequenced and inferred the phylogenetic position of 43 previously unsampled Neotropical species from COI, H3, WNT, 18S, 16S, and 12S. Based on our phylogenies we found that Neotropical psocids are generally not closely related to morphologically similar taxa in the Holarctic region. Consequently, the monophyletic status for the major groups within Psocidae (subfamilies and tribes) is recovered only when Holarctic groups are sampled (7-10 of 11 higher-level groups are monophyletic) but violated when Neotropical species are included in the dataset (1 of 11 higher-level groups are monophyletic). Leveraging the largest phylogeny of the Psocidae, our study pinpoints the downfalls of simply extending taxonomic knowledge from lineages of a certain area to inform diversity and evolution of lineages in other regions. HighlightsO_LITropical psocids comprise >60% of the extant family richness C_LIO_LIPrevious phylogenies have undersampled Tropical psocids C_LIO_LIHolarctic and Neotropical species are classified under the same morphological groups C_LIO_LIHolarctic and Neotropical generally correspond to evolutionarily distinct lineages C_LIO_LIPhylogenies based on Holarctic psocids poorly inform evolution in the Neotropics C_LI

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
2
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.8%
3
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.8%
4
Systematic Entomology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
5
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.8%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 20%
4.3%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 16%
4.3%
9
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
10
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.7%
11
Systematic Biology
121 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
12
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
13
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
14
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
15
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
16
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.1%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.9%
18
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
19
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
20
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
21
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
22
Journal of Biogeography
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
23
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
24
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
25
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
26
Journal of Systematics and Evolution
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
27
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
28
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
29
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.7%
30
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%