Back

Comparing Fecal, Saliva, and Chicha Microbiomes Between Mothers and Children in an Indigenous Ecuadorian Cohort

Adams, E. D.; Oliver, A.; Gille, A.; Alaniz, N.; Jamie, C.; Patton, J.; Whiteson, K.

2020-10-03 microbiology
10.1101/2020.10.02.323097 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Recent research has elucidated many factors which play a role in the development and composition of human microbiomes. In this study we briefly examine the microbiomes of saliva and fecal samples from 71 indigenous individuals, and chicha samples from 28 single family households in a remote community in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Fecal and saliva samples were collected at two separate time points whereas chicha samples were collected at four time points, once each day of the fermentation process. In total 324 samples were collected: 113 saliva, 108 chicha, and 103 fecal. Microbial composition and diversity were assessed using shotgun metagenome sequence data. Chicha samples were found to be nearly entirely composed of the order Lactobacillales, accounting for 90.1% of the relative abundance. Saliva samples also contained a high relative abundance of Lactobacillales (31.9%) as well as being composed of Neisseriales (12.8%), Actinomycineae (8.7%), Bacteroidales (7.0%), Clostridiales (6.8%), Micrococcineae (6.5%), and Pasteurellales (6.0%). Fecal samples were largely composed of the three orders Clostridiales (33.7%), Bacteroidales (21.9%), and Bifidobacteriales (16.5%). Comparison of -diversity, as calculated by Shannons Diversity Index, in mothers and their offspring showed no significant difference between the two groups in either fecal or saliva samples. Comparison of {beta}-diversity in fecal and saliva samples, as calculated by the Bray-Curtis Dissimilarity measure, within household units and between differing households showed that members of the same household were significantly less dissimilar to each other than to members of other households in the community. Average microbiome composition for individuals within fecal and saliva samples was assessed to determine the impact of an individuals household on the composition of their microbiome. Household was determined to have a significant impact on both fecal and oral microbiome compositions.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
14.1%
2
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.9%
3
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
9.0%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 13%
7.1%
5
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.2%
6
Microbial Ecology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
BMC Microbiology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
8
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.9%
9
Microbiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
10
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.0%
11
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
12
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
13
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
14
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Animal Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
16
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
Current Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
18
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
20
Gut Microbes
70 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
21
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Microbiology Resource Announcements
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
23
MicrobiologyOpen
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
24
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
25
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%