A national study of self-reported COVID symptoms during the first viral wave in Canada
Tang, X.; Gelband, H.; Lam, T.; Nagelkerke, N.; Reid, A.; Jha, P.; Action to beat Coronavirus (Ab-C) Study Investigators,
Show abstract
ImportanceAccurate understanding of COVID pandemic during the first viral wave in Canada could help prepare for future epidemic waves. ObjectiveTo track the early course of the pandemic by examining self-reported COVID symptoms over time before testing became widely available. DesignAdults from the nationally representative Angus Reid Forum were randomly invited to complete an online survey in May/June 2020. The study is a part of the Action to Beat Coronavirus antibody testing study. SettingA 20-item internet survey. Participants14,408 adults age 18 years of age. ExposuresThe months that respondents and any household members first experienced various respiratory, neurological, sleep, skin or gastric symptoms. Main Outcomes and Measure"COVID symptom-positive," defined as fever (or fever with hallucinations) plus at least one of difficulty breathing, a dry severe cough, loss of smell or "COVID toe." ResultsIn total, 14,408 panel members (48% male and 52% female) completed the survey. Despite overrepresentation of higher levels of education, the prevalence of obesity, smoking, diabetes and hypertension were similar to national census and health surveys. A total of 811 (5.6%) were COVID symptom-positive; highest rates were at ages 18-44 years (8.3% among), declining at older ages. Females had higher odds of reporting COVID symptoms (OR = 1.32, 95%CI 1.11 - 1.56) as did visible minorities (OR = 1.74, 1.29 - 2.35). COVID symptom positivity for respondents and their household members peaked in March (OR = 1.93, 95% CI = 1.59 - 2.34 compared to earlier months). Conclusions and RelevanceThis study enhances our current understanding of the progression of the COVID epidemic in Canada, with few laboratory-confirmed cases in January and February, peaking in April. The results suggest substantial viral transmission in March, before widespread testing began, and a gradual decline in cases since May.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cohort Profile: A national prospective cohort study of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic outcomes in the U.S. - The CHASING COVID Cohort Study 96%
- The patient experience of COVID-19: A qualitative investigation with symptomatic outpatients 94%
- Predictors of adverse outcome in patients with suspected COVID-19 managed in a ‘virtual hospital’ setting: a cohort study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Awareness, knowledge and trust in the Greek authorities towards COVID-19 pandemic: results from the Epirus Health Study cohort 93%
- How is the COVID-19 pandemic impacting our life, mental health, and well-being? Design and preliminary findings of the pan-Canadian longitudinal COHESION Study 93%
- Time trends in social contacts before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: the CONNECT study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patterns of SARS-CoV-2 testing preferences in a national cohort in the United States 94%
- Implications of COVID-19 vaccination and public health countermeasures on SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern in Canada: evidence from a spatial hierarchical cluster analysis 93%
- Comorbidities might be a risk factor for the incidence of COVID-19: Evidence from a web-based survey of 780,961 participants 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy January-March 2021 among 18-64 year old US adults by employment and occupation 91%
- Associations of Telemedicine vs. In-Person Ambulatory Care Visits on Cancellation Rates and 30-Day Follow-Up Hospitalizations and Emergency Department Visits 90%
- Smoking, distress and COVID-19 in England: cross-sectional population surveys from 2016 to 2020 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.