Performance of a rapid SARS-COV-2 serology test in whole blood and separated plasma
Vemulapati, S.
Show abstract
Rapid SARS-COV-2 related serology testing can help identify and manage the spread of infection in decentralized testing environments but the limitation in performance of existing tests in blood has restricted implementation of testing at the point-of-care. Optimization of existing rapid tests in whole blood will require significant effort in the short-term and there is a need for solutions to help bridge the gap in performance between plasma and whole blood. We demonstrate here the implementation of the H.E.R.M.E.S platform, a portable plasma separation system that can enhance the performance of blood-based diagnostic testing, with a commercially available SARS-COV-2 IgG/IgM serology rapid diagnostic test (RDT) in a blinded study with 61 human samples. We compare the performance of the RDT in whole blood and separated plasma and highlight that plasma yields a 39% increase in positivity agreement with PCR in samples collected from patients with early infections. We further legitimize the increase in positivity agreement rate with the help of an independent evaluation by 10 previously untrained users. The H.E.R.M.E.S plasma separation system circumvents the need for assay optimization in whole blood and furthers the legitimacy of incorporating SARS-COV-2 serology RDTs at the point-of-care. The data highlighted in this work makes a compelling case for the incorporation of the H.E.R.M.E.S system in large scale efforts to perform SARS-COV-2 serology testing in decentralized testing environments.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of Serological SARS-CoV-2 Lateral Flow Assays for Rapid Point of Care Testing 96%
- Estimating the false positive rate of highly automated SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification testing 96%
- Analytical and Clinical Comparison of Three Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Detection 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rapid semi-quantitative point of care diagnostic test for post vaccination antibody monitoring 96%
- A Reagent and Virus Benchmarking Panel for a Uniform Analytical Performance Assessment of N Antigen–Based Diagnostic Tests for COVID-19 96%
- Comparison of LIAISON QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus with QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Point of Care Devices in the Laboratory and Clinical Setting 97%
- Evaluation of performance of two SARS-CoV-2 Rapid whole-blood finger-stick IgM-IgGCombined Antibody Tests 97%
- A High-throughput Microsphere-based Immunoassay of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM Testing for COVID-19 Diagnostics 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- TOP-Plus is a Versatile Biosensor Platform for Monitoring SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Durability 95%
- Clinical application of ISO and CEN/TS standards for liquid biopsies - information everybody wants but nobody wants to pay for 94%
- Evaluation of high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 serological assays in a longitudinal cohort of mild COVID-19 patients: sensitivity, specificity and association with virus neutralization test 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay on a fully automated system for rapid on-demand testing in the hospital setting 96%
- Pushing beyond specifications: Evaluation of linearity and clinical performance of a fully automated SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay for reliable quantification in blood and other materials outside recommendations 95%
- Impaired performance of SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid tests at elevated temperatures 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.