Nabo - a framework to define leukemia-initiating cells and differentiation in single-cell RNA-sequencing data
Dhapola, P.; Eldeeb, M.; Ugale, A.; Olofzon, R.; Erlandsson, E.; Soneji, S.; Bryder, D.; Karlsson, G.
Show abstract
Single-cell transcriptomics facilitates innovative approaches to define and identify cell types within tissues and cell populations. An emerging interest in the cancer field is to assess the heterogeneity of transformed cells, including the identification of tumor-initiating cells based on similarities to their normal counterparts. However, such cell mapping is often confounded by the large effects on total gene expression programs introduced by strong perturbations such as an oncogenic event. Here, we present Nabo, a novel computational method that allows mapping of cells from one population to the most similar cells in a reference population, independently of confounding changes to gene expression programs initiated by perturbation. We validated this method on multiple datasets from different sources and platforms and show that Nabo achieves higher rates of accuracy than conventional classification methods. Nabo is available as an integrated toolkit for preprocessing, cell mapping, differential gene expression identification, and visualization of single-cell RNA-Seq data. For exploratory studies, Nabo includes methods to help evaluate the reliability of cell mapping results. We applied Nabo on droplet-based single-cell RNA-Seq data of healthy and oncogene-induced (MLL-ENL) hematopoietic progenitor cells (GMLPs) differentiating in vitro. Despite a substantial cellular heterogeneity resulting from differentiation of GMLPs and the large transcriptional effects induced by the fusion oncogene, Nabo could pinpoint the specific cell stage where differentiation arrest occurs, which included an immunophenotypic definition of the tumor-initiating population. Thus, Nabo allows for relevant comparison between target and control cells, without being confounded by differences in population heterogeneity.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- cellHarmony: Cell-level matching and holistic comparison of single-cell transcriptomes 98%
- CelLink: integrating single-cell multi-omics data with weak feature linkage and imbalanced cell populations 95%
- Inferring cell diversity in single cell data using consortium-scale epigenetic data as a biological anchor for cell identity 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- mcRigor: a statistical method to enhance the rigor of metacell partitioning in single-cell data analysis 97%
- A statistical framework for differential pseudotime analysis with multiple single-cell RNA-seq samples 96%
- Clonal reconstruction from co-occurrence of vector integration sites allows accurate quantification of expanding clones in vivo 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Reconstruction of dynamic regulatory networks reveals signaling-induced topology changes associated with germ layer specification 96%
- Entropy sorting of single cell RNA sequencing datareveals the inner cell mass in the humanpre-implantation embryo 95%
- Transient DUX4 expression induces blastomere-like expression program that is marked by SLC34A2 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.