Back

Combining epiGBS markers with long read transcriptome sequencing to assess differentiation associated with habitat in Reynoutria (aka Fallopia)

Robertson, M. H.; Alvarez, M. F.; van Gurp, T. P.; Wagemaker, N. C. A. M.; Yu, F.; Moraga Amador, D.; Farmerie, W. G.; Verhoeven, K.; Richards, C. L.

2020-10-01 plant biology
10.1101/2020.09.30.317966 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Despite the limitations of genetic bottlenecks, several invasive species appear to thrive in non-native ranges with extremely low levels of sequence-based genetic variation. We previously demonstrated differentiation of DNA methylation to habitat types of the highly clonal, genetically depauperate Japanese knotweeds using anonymous markers, but the functional relevance of this DNA methylation variation is unknown. Here, we sequenced the full transcriptome combined with a reduced representation bisulfite sequencing approach, epigenotyping by sequencing (epiGBS), to characterize the association among DNA methylation, functional transcripts and the diverse habitat types occupied by the invasive Reynoutria species. We identified 50,435 putative transcripts overall, of which 48,866 were annotated with the NCBI NR database. Of these 17,872 (35%) and 16,122 (32%) transcripts shared sequence identity with Arabidopsis thaliana and Beta vulgaris, respectively. We found genetic differentiation by habitat type suggesting the action of selection and a marginal pattern of differentiation of DNA methylation among habitats, which appears to be associated with sequence differences. However, we found no individual methylation loci associated with habitat, limiting our ability to make functional interpretations. Regardless of the source of variation in DNA methylation, these changes may represent an important component of the response to environmental conditions, particularly in highly clonal plants, but more fine scale genomics analysis is required to test if DNA methylation variation in this system is responsible for functional divergence.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.