Consequences of Mismatch, Misalignment, and Rotation of Toric Intraocular Lensesin Refractive Cataract SurgeryPart 2. Avoiding Flip Flops
Sayegh, S. I.
Show abstract
PurposeTo show current approaches for overcorrecting astigmatism and "flipping" its axis need be reconsidered in light of methods we introduce that take into account both mismatch and misalignment of the toric intraocular lens (tIOL) with respect to the astigmatism to be corrected at the time of cataract surgery. SettingPrivate Practice and Research Center. The EYE Center. Champaign, IL, USA. DesignFormal Analytical Study MethodsIn the most common surgical situation where both mismatch and misalignment exist, we present an analysis of the point at which overcorrection and undercorrection residuals coincide, yielding a simple but powerful methodology to predict the optimal degree of overcorrection with a tIOL. The method is illustrated for tIOLs used in surgical practice. ResultsThe minimum astigmatism appropriate to overcorrect with a tIOL is given by, [Formula],where m is the midpoint threshold used by "split-the-difference" algorithms and{chi} is the estimate of tIOL misalignment due to all causes. Correspondingly, the maximum overcorrection, {Omega}max, that should be attempted is [Formula] where [Formula] is the dioptric step at the corneal plane, with {sigma} = H - B, where H = n {sigma} is the cylinder of the overcorrecting tIOL and B = (n - 1){sigma} is the cylinder of the undercorrecting tIOL, both at the IOL plane,{tau} is the toricity ratio and{gamma} relates to the angle of misalignment{chi} by [Formula] which can be approximated by [Formula]. {Omega} maxfactors elegantly in the product of [Formula], the (ideal) midpoint correction for perfect alignment, by the bracketed term, representing the percent reduction of the ideal value in a realistic surgical situation with estimated misalignment{chi} . To illustrate: an eye of average dimensions [Formula] and tIOLs from major manufacturers [Formula], with A = 2.35 D dictating n = 5. For a misalignment of 10{degrees}{Omega}max{cong} 0.10 D is the maximum overcorrection that should be accepted, significantly smaller than the midpoint [Formula] D, recommended by many current tIOL calculators. ConclusionAn optimal method is presented for the selection of an overcorrecting tIOL at the time of refractive cataract surgery with improvement over current tIOL calculators methods.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors predicting the visual outcome of intracorneal ring segment for keratoconus 96%
- Demographic profiles of contact lens wearers and their association with lens wear characteristics in Trinidad and Tobago: A retrospective study 95%
- Identifying the Influencing Factors for Cataract Surgery Uptake in Malaysia 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of the Nallasamy Formula: A Stacking Ensemble Machine Learning Method for Refraction Prediction in Cataract Surgery 96%
- AI-Powered Effective Lens Position Prediction Improves the Accuracy of Existing Lens Formulas 96%
- Autonomous Screening for Laser Photocoagulation in Fundus Images Using Deep Learning 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gradient Boosting Decision Tree Algorithm for the Prediction of Postoperative Intraocular Lens Position in Cataract Surgery 95%
- Visual field evaluation using Zippy Adaptive Threshold Algorithm (ZATA) Standard and ZATA Fast in patients with glaucoma and healthy individuals 93%
- Rates of Glaucoma Progression Derived from Linear Mixed Models Using Varied Random Effect Distributions 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of the patient reported outcome measures tool “Catquest” in Odia language 95%
- Clinicopathological Evaluation of Dry eyes and Ocular surface in Newly diagnosed patients of Hyperthyroidism and Hypothyroidism and its Comparison to Healthy Subjects 93%
- A Novel Maxillofacial Technology for Drug Administration-A Randomized Controlled Trial Using Metronidazole. 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.