Back

Consequences of Mismatch, Misalignment, and Rotation of Toric Intraocular Lensesin Refractive Cataract SurgeryPart 2. Avoiding Flip Flops

Sayegh, S. I.

2020-09-30 ophthalmology
10.1101/2020.09.30.20203380
Show abstract

PurposeTo show current approaches for overcorrecting astigmatism and "flipping" its axis need be reconsidered in light of methods we introduce that take into account both mismatch and misalignment of the toric intraocular lens (tIOL) with respect to the astigmatism to be corrected at the time of cataract surgery. SettingPrivate Practice and Research Center. The EYE Center. Champaign, IL, USA. DesignFormal Analytical Study MethodsIn the most common surgical situation where both mismatch and misalignment exist, we present an analysis of the point at which overcorrection and undercorrection residuals coincide, yielding a simple but powerful methodology to predict the optimal degree of overcorrection with a tIOL. The method is illustrated for tIOLs used in surgical practice. ResultsThe minimum astigmatism appropriate to overcorrect with a tIOL is given by, [Formula],where m is the midpoint threshold used by "split-the-difference" algorithms and{chi} is the estimate of tIOL misalignment due to all causes. Correspondingly, the maximum overcorrection, {Omega}max, that should be attempted is [Formula] where [Formula] is the dioptric step at the corneal plane, with {sigma} = H - B, where H = n {sigma} is the cylinder of the overcorrecting tIOL and B = (n - 1){sigma} is the cylinder of the undercorrecting tIOL, both at the IOL plane,{tau} is the toricity ratio and{gamma} relates to the angle of misalignment{chi} by [Formula] which can be approximated by [Formula]. {Omega} maxfactors elegantly in the product of [Formula], the (ideal) midpoint correction for perfect alignment, by the bracketed term, representing the percent reduction of the ideal value in a realistic surgical situation with estimated misalignment{chi} . To illustrate: an eye of average dimensions [Formula] and tIOLs from major manufacturers [Formula], with A = 2.35 D dictating n = 5. For a misalignment of 10{degrees}{Omega}max{cong} 0.10 D is the maximum overcorrection that should be accepted, significantly smaller than the midpoint [Formula] D, recommended by many current tIOL calculators. ConclusionAn optimal method is presented for the selection of an overcorrecting tIOL at the time of refractive cataract surgery with improvement over current tIOL calculators methods.

Matching journals

1
British Journal of Ophthalmology
BMJ · based on 13 published papers
#1
205× avg
2
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 25%
17.1%
3
Translational Vision Science & Technology
Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) · based on 18 published papers
Top 0.3%
115× avg
4
Eye
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.4%
89× avg
5
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 30%
5.9%
6
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 22%
5.0%
7
Ophthalmology Science
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.6%
60× avg
8
Cureus
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 64 published papers
Top 3%
7.3× avg
9
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.6%
49× avg
10
F1000Research
F1000 Research Ltd · based on 28 published papers
Top 0.2%
18× avg
11
Brain Sciences
MDPI AG · based on 19 published papers
Top 2%
11× avg
12
Journal of Clinical Medicine
MDPI AG · based on 77 published papers
Top 14%
1.5× avg
13
Annals of Translational Medicine
AME Publishing Company · based on 14 published papers
Top 3%
6.0× avg
14
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 99 published papers
Top 19%
0.7%
15
Computers in Biology and Medicine
Elsevier BV · based on 39 published papers
Top 7%
2.9× avg