Back

Pisum sativum has no competitive responses to neighbours: a case study in reproducible ecology

Mobley, M. L.; Kruse, A. S.; McNickle, G. G.

2020-10-01 ecology
10.1101/2020.09.29.318550 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Plant-plant competition is ubiquitous in nature. However, studying below ground behaviour of roots has always posed certain difficulties. Pea (Pisum sativum L.) has become a sort of model species for ecological studies about how plant roots respond to neighbouring plant roots and barriers in soil. However, published results point in several different directions. This has sometimes been interpreted as pea having sophisticated context dependent responses that can change in complex ways depending on its surroundings. To explore this further, here, we combine the result of five new experiments with published results to examine 18 unique experiments from 7 different studies for a total of 254 replicates. We used a Bayesian hierarchical meta-analysis approach to estimating the likely effect size from the available data, as well as quantify heterogeneity among different experiments, studies and cultivars. The posterior distributions show that, at the coarsest possible scale of total root production, it is unlikely that P. sativum root growth is influenced by either neighbours or barriers to root growth imposed by the walls of pots that vary in volume. We suggest that further work should consider repeating experiments that reported finer scale root plasticity in pea at the rhizosphere scale, and also consider alternative model species for the study of plant root responses to external cues.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.0%
2
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
3
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
4
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.7%
5
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.8%
6
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.9%
8
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 26%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
Plant and Soil
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
11
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.2%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
13
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.3%
14
Annals of Botany
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
15
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
16
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
18
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
19
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
20
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
21
Ecological Monographs
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
22
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
23
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
24
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
25
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
29
Biological Invasions
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
30
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%