Back

Virus evolution affected early COVID-19 spread

Corcoran, D.; Urban, M. C.; Wegrzyn, J.; Merow, C.

2020-09-30 epidemiology
10.1101/2020.09.29.20202416 medRxiv
Show abstract

As the SARS-Cov-2 virus spreads around the world afflicting millions of people, it has undergone divergent genetic mutations. Although most of these mutations are expected to be inconsequential, some mutations in the spike protein structure have been hypothesized to affect the critical stage at which the virus invades human cells, which could affect transmission probability and disease expression. If true, then we expect an increased growth rate of reported COVID-19 cases in regions dominated by viruses with these altered proteins. We modeled early global infection dynamics based on clade assignment along with other demographic and meteorological factors previously found to be important. Clade, but not variant D614G which has been associated with increased viral load, enhanced our ability to describe early COVID-19 growth dynamics. Including clade identity in models significantly improved predictions over earlier work based only on weather and demographic variables. In particular, higher proportions of clade 19A and 19B were negatively correlated with COVID-19 growth rate, whereas higher proportions of 20A and 20C were positively correlated with growth rate. A strong interaction between the prevalence of clade 20C and relative humidity suggests that the impact of clade identity might be more important when coupled with certain weather conditions. In particular, 20C an 20A generate the highest growth rates when coupled with low humidity. Projections based on data through April 2020 suggest that, without intervention, COVID-19 has the potential to grow more quickly in regions dominated by the 20A and 20C clades, including most of South and North America.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Virus Evolution
140 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.2%
2
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.5%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.4%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.6%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 25%
3.6%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
8
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.7%
9
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.9%
11
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
12
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
15
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.2%
16
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
17
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.0%
19
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.0%
20
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Virology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
22
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
23
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Virus Research
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
27
Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
29
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
30
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%