Back

Boolean Implication Analysis Improves Prediction Accuracy of In Silico Gene Reporting of Retinal Cell Types

Subramanian, R.; Sahoo, D.

2020-10-01 bioinformatics
10.1101/2020.09.28.317313 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The retina is a complex tissue containing multiple cell types that is essential for vision. Understanding the gene expression patterns of various retinal cell types has potential applications in regenerative medicine. Retinal organoids (optic vesicles) derived from pluripotent stem cells have begun to yield insights into the transcriptomics of developing retinal cell types in humans through single cell RNA-sequencing studies. Previous methods of gene reporting have relied upon techniques in vivo using microarray data, or correlational and dimension reduction methods for analyzing single cell RNA-sequencing data in silico. Here, we present a bioinformatic approach using Boolean implication to discover retinal cell type-specific genes. We apply this approach to previously published retina and retinal organoid datasets and improve upon previously published correlational methods. Our method improves the prediction accuracy and reproducibility of marker genes of retinal cell types and discovers several new high confidence cone and rod-specific genes. Furthermore, our method is general and can impact all areas of gene expression analyses in cancer and other human diseases. Significance StatementEfforts to derive retinal cell types from pluripotent stem cells to the end of curing retinal disease require robust characterization of these cell types gene expression patterns. The Boolean method described in this study improves prediction accuracy of earlier methods of gene reporting, and allows for the discovery and validation of retinal cell type-specific marker genes. The invariant nature of results from Boolean implication analysis can yield high-value molecular markers that can be used as biomarkers or drug targets. O_FIG_DISPLAY_L [Figure 1] M_FIG_DISPLAY C_FIG_DISPLAY

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.