Genetic architecture of gene regulation in Indonesian populations identifies QTLs associated with local ancestry and archaic introgression
Natri, H. M.; Hudjashov, G.; Jacobs, G.; Kusuma, P.; Saag, L.; Darusallam, C. C.; Metspalu, M.; Sudoyo, H.; Cox, M. P.; Gallego Romero, I.; Banovich, N. E.
Show abstract
Lack of diversity in human genomics limits our understanding of the genetic underpinnings of complex traits, hinders precision medicine, and contributes to health disparities. To map genetic effects on gene regulation in the underrepresented Indonesian population, we have integrated genotype, gene expression, and CpG methylation data from 115 participants across three island populations that capture the major sources of genomic diversity on the region. In a comparison with a European dataset, we identify 166 uniquely Indonesia-specific eQTLs, highlighting the benefits of performing association studies on non-European populations. By combining local ancestry and archaic introgression inference eQTLs and methylQTLs, we identify regulatory loci driven by modern Papuan ancestry as well as introgressed Denisovan and Neanderthal variation. GWAS colocalization connects QTLs detected here to hematological traits. Our findings illustrate how local ancestry and archaic introgression drive variation in gene regulation across genetically distinct and in admixed populations.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Extraordinary selection on the human X chromosome associated with archaic admixture 96%
- Best practices for multi-ancestry, meta-analytic transcriptome-wide association studies: lessons from the Global Biobank Meta-analysis Initiative 96%
- Polymorphic short tandem repeats make widespread contributions to blood and serum traits 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.