Back

Initial experience has lasting effect on repeated risky decisions

Kobor, A.; Kardos, Z.; Takacs, A.; Elteto, N.; Janacsek, K.; Toth-Faber, E.; Csepe, V.; Nemeth, D.

2020-09-26 neuroscience
10.1101/2020.09.25.313551 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Both primarily and recently encountered information have been shown to influence experience-based risky decision making. The primacy effect predicts that initial experience will influence later choices even if outcome probabilities change and reward is ultimately more or less sparse than primarily experienced. However, it has not been investigated whether extended initial experience would induce a more profound primacy effect upon risky choices than brief experience. Therefore, the present study tested in two experiments whether young adults adjusted their risk-taking behavior in the Balloon Analogue Risk task after an unsignaled and unexpected change point. The change point separated early "good luck" or "bad luck" trials from subsequent ones. While mostly positive (more reward) or mostly negative (no reward) events characterized the early trials, subsequent trials were unbiased. In Experiment 1, the change point occurred after one-sixth or one-third of the trials (brief vs. extended experience) without intermittence, whereas in Experiment 2, it occurred between separate task phases. In Experiment 1, if negative events characterized the early trials, after the change point, risk-taking behavior increased as compared with the early trials. Conversely, if positive events characterized the early trials, risk-taking behavior decreased after the change point. Although the adjustment of risk-taking behavior occurred due to integrating recent experiences, the impact of initial experience was simultaneously observed. The length of initial experience did not reliably influence the adjustment of behavior. In Experiment 2, participants became more prone to take risks as the task progressed, indicating that the impact of initial experience could be overcome. Altogether, we suggest that initial beliefs about outcome probabilities can be updated by recent experiences to adapt to the continuously changing decision environment.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.4%
2
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
3
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
5
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 11%
3.1%
8
Consciousness and Cognition
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
9
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.7%
10
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
11
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
50% of probability mass above
12
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
13
Psychophysiology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
15
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
npj Science of Learning
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
18
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.5%
20
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
21
Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
22
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
23
Learning & Memory
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
24
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
25
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.3%
26
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
27
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
28
Biological Psychology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
29
Psychological Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
30
Psychological Review
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%