Attention affects overall gain but not selective contrast at meter frequencies in the neural processing of rhythm
Lenc, T.; Keller, P. E.; Varlet, M.; Nozaradan, S.
Show abstract
When listening to music, humans spontaneously perceive and synchronize movement to periodic pulses of meter. A growing body of evidence suggests that this widespread ability is related to neural processes that selectively enhance meter periodicities. However, to what extent these neural processes are affected by the attentional state of the listener remains largely unknown. Here, we recorded EEG while participants listened to auditory rhythms and detected small changes in tempo or pitch of the stimulus, or performed a visual task. The overall neural response to the auditory input decreased when participants attended the visual modality, indicating generally lower sensitivity to acoustic information. However, the selective contrast at meter periodicities did not differ across the three tasks. Moreover, this selective contrast could be trivially accounted for by biologically-plausible models of subcortical auditory processing, but only when meter periodicities were already prominent in the acoustic input. However, when meter periodicities were not prominent in the auditory input, the EEG responses could not be explained by low-level processing. This was also confirmed by early auditory responses that originate predominantly in early auditory areas and were recorded in the same EEG. The contrast at meter periodicities in these early responses was consistently smaller than in the EEG responses originating mainly from higher-level processing stages. Together, these results demonstrate that selective contrast at meter periodicities involves higher-level neural processes that may be engaged automatically, irrespective of behavioral context. This robust shaping of the neural representation of rhythm might thus contribute to spontaneous and effortless synchronization to musical meter in humans across cultures.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Delta/theta band EEG differentially tracks low and high frequency speech-derived envelopes 98%
- Decomposing neural responses to melodic surprise in musicians and non-musicians: evidence for a hierarchy of predictions in the auditory system 98%
- Dimension-Selective Attention and Dimensional Salience Modulate Cortical Tracking of Acoustic Dimensions 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- The inattentional rhythm in audition 97%
- General auditory and speech-specific contributions to cortical envelope tracking revealed using auditory chimeras 97%
- Salience-dependent disruption of sustained auditory attention can be inferred from evoked pupil responses and neural tracking of task-irrelevant sounds 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Perceptual learning of random acoustic patterns: Impact of temporal regularity and attention 97%
- The Effect of Previously Encountered Sensory Information on Neural Representations of Predictability: Evidence from Human EEG 97%
- Decoding violated sensory expectations from the auditory cortex of anaesthetized mice: Hierarchical recurrent neural network depicts separate 'danger' and 'safety' units 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Consonance perception in congenital amusia: behavioral and brain responses to harmonicity and beating cues 97%
- Beat-based and memory-based temporal expectations in rhythm: similar perceptual effects, different underlying mechanisms 97%
- Implicit versus explicit timing - separate or shared mechanisms? 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.