Back

Performance Assessment of First-Generation AntiSARS-CoV-2 Serological Assays

Shamsi, T. S.; Imam, M.; Khawaja, S.; Naz, A.; Siddiqi, A. Q.; Nafees, T. S.; Younas, A.; Shamsi, U.; Shabir, I.; Ahmed, S.; Tariq, N.; Tariq, S.

2020-09-24 pathology
10.1101/2020.09.22.20197046 medRxiv
Show abstract

The clinical and epidemiological use of SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays is under debate with urgent need to validate and verify the performance of SARS-CoV-2 serologic assays. We aim to assess the clinical and analytical performance of three commercial serological assays of SARS-CoV-2, comparing three anti-SARS-CoV-2-IgG ELISA and identifying the seroconversion and seroprevalence in our population. A cross sectional study conducted from April 2020 to July 2020 at National Institute of Blood disease and Bone Marrow Transplantation Karachi, Pakistan with sample size of 404, enrolled consecutively. Participants were categorized into four groups namely convalescent plasmadonors (CPDs n=239), health care professionals (HCPs n=44), healthy blood donors (HBDs n=70) and from community (n=51). We evaluated the performance of Elecsys anti-SARS-CoV-2 electrochemiluminescence (ECLIA) assay on Cobas-e411 by Roche, three qualitative anti-SARS-CoV-2-IgG enzyme linked imunosorbant assay (ELISA) by (Generic assays, Euroimmun & Omega diagnostics), one quantitative ELISA assay by AESKU Diagnostics and two immune chromatography(ICT) kits namely InstaTest by CORTEZ and TEST IT by TURKLAB. From total 404 subjects, 322 (83.5%) were males. Mean age was 36.79{+/-}11.95 years. Among 239 in CPDs group, 202(84.5%) showed positive antibodies by ECLIA. The qualitative anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG ELISA was positive in 174 (72.8%) and quantitative IgG in 180(75.3%) with mean titer of 56.7 {+/-}39.7 U/ml. Sensitivity and specificity of ECLIA were 97.44& 99%, ELISA by Generic assays were 67.85% and 89.9%; Euroimmun had 90.38% and 94.9%; Omega Diagnostics 96.4% and 95% and the AESKULISA 93.75% and 100% respectively. Seroconversion was found to be 53.8% and 77.77% within 7 -8 days and 12 to 14 days post onset of symptoms respectively. ICT had more specificity but less sensitivity. Seroprevalence was found to be 84.5%, 40.9% and 21.4% in CPDs, HCPs and HBDs respectively. The Roche ECLIA, qualitative ELISA by Omega Diagnostics & Euroimmun showed higher sensitivity as well as higher specificity. Quantitative ELISA has higher specificity and relatively high sensitivity. Significant numbers of COVID patients do not have detectable antibodies by all assays.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 1%
37.9%
2
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
50% of probability mass above
3
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
5
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
6
Journal of Clinical Virology Plus
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
7
Journal of Virological Methods
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
8
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
9
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
11
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
13
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
14
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
15
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
16
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
17
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
20
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Access Microbiology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
23
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%