Performance Assessment of First-Generation AntiSARS-CoV-2 Serological Assays
Shamsi, T. S.; Imam, M.; Khawaja, S.; Naz, A.; Siddiqi, A. Q.; Nafees, T. S.; Younas, A.; Shamsi, U.; Shabir, I.; Ahmed, S.; Tariq, N.; Tariq, S.
Show abstract
The clinical and epidemiological use of SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays is under debate with urgent need to validate and verify the performance of SARS-CoV-2 serologic assays. We aim to assess the clinical and analytical performance of three commercial serological assays of SARS-CoV-2, comparing three anti-SARS-CoV-2-IgG ELISA and identifying the seroconversion and seroprevalence in our population. A cross sectional study conducted from April 2020 to July 2020 at National Institute of Blood disease and Bone Marrow Transplantation Karachi, Pakistan with sample size of 404, enrolled consecutively. Participants were categorized into four groups namely convalescent plasmadonors (CPDs n=239), health care professionals (HCPs n=44), healthy blood donors (HBDs n=70) and from community (n=51). We evaluated the performance of Elecsys anti-SARS-CoV-2 electrochemiluminescence (ECLIA) assay on Cobas-e411 by Roche, three qualitative anti-SARS-CoV-2-IgG enzyme linked imunosorbant assay (ELISA) by (Generic assays, Euroimmun & Omega diagnostics), one quantitative ELISA assay by AESKU Diagnostics and two immune chromatography(ICT) kits namely InstaTest by CORTEZ and TEST IT by TURKLAB. From total 404 subjects, 322 (83.5%) were males. Mean age was 36.79{+/-}11.95 years. Among 239 in CPDs group, 202(84.5%) showed positive antibodies by ECLIA. The qualitative anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG ELISA was positive in 174 (72.8%) and quantitative IgG in 180(75.3%) with mean titer of 56.7 {+/-}39.7 U/ml. Sensitivity and specificity of ECLIA were 97.44& 99%, ELISA by Generic assays were 67.85% and 89.9%; Euroimmun had 90.38% and 94.9%; Omega Diagnostics 96.4% and 95% and the AESKULISA 93.75% and 100% respectively. Seroconversion was found to be 53.8% and 77.77% within 7 -8 days and 12 to 14 days post onset of symptoms respectively. ICT had more specificity but less sensitivity. Seroprevalence was found to be 84.5%, 40.9% and 21.4% in CPDs, HCPs and HBDs respectively. The Roche ECLIA, qualitative ELISA by Omega Diagnostics & Euroimmun showed higher sensitivity as well as higher specificity. Quantitative ELISA has higher specificity and relatively high sensitivity. Significant numbers of COVID patients do not have detectable antibodies by all assays.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development And Performance Evaluation of A Rapid In-House ELISA for Retrospective Serosurveillance of SARS-CoV-2 97%
- Development and Evaluation of Two Rapid Indigenous IgG-ELISA immobilized with ACE-2 Binding Peptides for Detection Neutralizing Antibodies Against SARS-CoV-2 97%
- Performance estimation of two in-house ELISA assays for COVID-19 surveillance through the combined detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgA, IgM, and IgG immunoglobulin isotypes 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical and laboratory characteristics in outpatient diagnosis of COVID-19 in healthcare professionals in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 94%
- Increasing both specificity and sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests by using an adaptive orthogonal testing approach 93%
- Development of a qualitative real-time RT-PCR assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2: A guide and case study in setting up an emergency-use, laboratory-developed molecular assay 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation and Performance Comparison of Three SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Assays 96%
- Probable causes and risk factors for positive SARS-CoV-2 test in recovered patients: Evidence from Brunei Darussalam 95%
- Evaluation the auxiliary diagnosis value of antibodies assays for detection of novel coronavirus (SARS-Cov-2) causing an outbreak of pneumonia (COVID-19) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Antibodies anti-SARS-CoV2 time-course in patients and vaccinated subjects: an evaluation of the harmonization of two different methods 95%
- Evaluation of VIDAS® diagnostic assay prototypes detecting dengue virus NS1 antigen and anti-dengue virus IgM and IgG antibodies 94%
- Evaluation of commercial qPCR kits for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in pooled samples 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.