Perch selection of three species of kingfishers at the Pantanal wetland, Brazil
Contreras Peinado, L.; Ortega, Z.
Show abstract
Animal movement and behavior depend on the distribution of resources on the habitat. Therefore, individual animals are constantly making decisions on resource selection based on different attributes of the resource or its associated environmental variables. For fish-eating birds as kingfishers, selecting a suitable perch can report many benefits, as improving fishing success or reducing predation risk. Nowadays, not only natural structures, as branches, are available for birds to perch but also artificial ones, as electric lines. Thus, we aimed to understand which variables drive kingfishers perch selection, including the potential effect of its anthropic origin. We studied perch selection of three species of kingfishers inhabiting the Pantanal of Miranda of Brazil: Megaceryle torquata, Chloroceryle amazona and Chloroceryle americana. They feed in temporary ponds that are rich in trophic resources, where they have both natural and artificial potential perches. We hypothesized that artificial perches could be strongly selected, as they are more stable than natural ones and go through the ponds, providing a long surface to select optimal conditions. We assessed how kingfishers are selecting perches based on four ecologically relevant traits: (1) being artificial or natural, perch height, (3) distance to the water, and (4) plant cover. We used a resource selection function (RSF) approach to quantify the effect of these variables in the probability of presence of kingfishers. The artificial origin of a perch was independent of the probability of selection for the three species. Furthermore, birds acted randomly to the other studied variables, except for individuals of C. amazona, which select higher perches, above 3.20 m. We discuss the implications of these results for understanding the behavioral ecology and use of space of neotropical kingfishers, and how this affects their vulnerability to human habitat alterations. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=194 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/306027v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (58K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@6bc8d1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@4d4d0dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@fdb9aborg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1a88b15_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Insights on the effect of mega-carcass abundance on the population dynamics of a facultative scavenger predator and its prey 95%
- Bimodal breeding phenology in the parsley frog Pelodytes punctatus as a bet-hedging strategy in an unpredictable environment despite strong priority effects 95%
- Are all waterholes equal from a lion's view? Exploring the role of prey abundance and catchability in waterhole visitation patterns in a savannah ecosystem 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for mark-resight nesting population estimation of adult female green sea turtles at Raine Island 94%
- Sea lamprey nests promote the diversity of benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages 93%
- Taxonomic and functional anuran beta diversity of the subtropical metacommunity respond differentially to environmental and spatial predictors 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fine-scale coexistence between Mediterranean mesocarnivores is mediated by spatial, temporal and trophic resource partitioning 95%
- How do King Cobras move across a major highway? Unintentional wildlife crossing structures may facilitate movement. 94%
- Relationship between salmon egg subsidy and the distribution of an avian predator 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Characterization of habitat requirements of European fishing spiders 95%
- Living Shorelines Achieve Functional Equivalence to Natural Fringe Marshes across Multiple Ecological Metrics 93%
- Transects, quadrats, or points? What is the best combination to get a precise estimation of a coral community? 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.