Back

Determining the domain-level reaction-diffusion properties of cellular proteins by incorporating genetic engineering to FRAP-based framework

Saito, T.; Matsunaga, D.; Matsui, T. S.; Noi, K.; Deguchi, S.

2020-09-21 bioengineering
10.1101/2020.09.21.305615 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Proteins in cells undergo repeated association to other molecules, thereby reducing the apparent extent of their intracellular diffusion. While much effort has been made to analytically decouple these combined effects of pure diffusion and chemical reaction, it is difficult to attribute the measured quantities to the nature of specific domains of the probed proteins particularly if, as is often the case, the protein has multiple domains to independently interact with the same types but different molecules. Motivated by the common goal in cell signaling research aimed at identifying the protein domains responsible for particular intermolecular interactions, here we describe a new approach to determining the domain-level reaction and pure diffusion properties. To validate this methodology, we apply it to transgelin-2, an actin-binding protein whose intracellular dynamics remains elusive. We develop a fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP)-based framework, in which comprehensive combinations of domain-deletion mutants are created with genetic engineering, and the difference among the mutants in FRAP response is analyzed. We demonstrate that transgelin-2 in cells interacts with F-actin via two separate domains, and the chemical equilibrium constant of the interaction is determined at the individual domain levels. Its pure diffusion properties independent of the association to F-actin is also obtained. This approach requires some effort to construct the mutants, but instead enables in situ domain-level determination of the physicochemical properties, which will be useful, as specifically shown here for transgelin-2, in addressing the signaling mechanism of cellular proteins.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.