Back

APC mutant cells exploit compensatory chromosome alterations to restore tumour cell fitness

Kawasaki, Y.; Hamaji, T.; Owada, K.; Hayashi, A.; Wu, Y.; Nogi, T.; Okada, M.; Kouyama, Y.; Niida, A.; Mimori, K.; Kuroda, T.; Senda, T.; Ohsugi, M.; Fumoto, K.; Kikuchi, A.; Widlund, P. O.; Kiyosue, K.; Yamashita, N.; Morita, M.; Yokota, H.; Arjunan, S. N. V.; Chew, W.-X.; Takahashi, K.; Legant, W. R.; Chen, B.-C.; Betzig, E.; Smits, R.; Fodde, R.; Oshima, H.; Oshima, M.; Taketo, M. M.; Akiyama, T.; Mimori-Kiyosue, Y.

2020-09-18 cell biology
10.1101/2020.09.18.303016 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cancer cells tolerate copy number alterations (CNAs) of genomic regions that are lethal to non-cancer cells. Certain CNAs are preferentially associated with specific cancer types and lineages, but the mechanisms underlying the emergence and selection of specific CNAs remain unclear. Adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) mutations induce mitotic errors, but their impact on tumor evolution remains elusive. We investigated APC function in cultured cells and tumors and found that its loss led to {beta}-catenin accumulation at centrosomes, suppressing its maturation through inhibition of key centrosome regulators, including Aurora kinase A (AURKA) that promotes tumor growth. These defects collectively reduced cellular fitness, leading to impaired mitotic fidelity and delayed cell cycle progression. However, in APC-mutant tumors, AURKA activity was maintained, at least in part, through the amplification of chromosomes harboring AURKA and its activator genes, yet this alone was insufficient to fully restore proliferation: aberrant chromosomal reorganization also emerged and contributed to the adaptive fitness of APC-mutant cells. Such a process of adaptive CNA selection provides a framework for understanding how specific CNAs are selected to counteract disadvantages imposed by genetic alterations during tumor progression, providing one key insight into how specific CNAs are selected in this context.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.