Development of an MRI Compatible Nasal Drug Delivery Method: Probing Nicotine Addiction Dynamics
Mujica-Parodi, L. R.; Kumar, R.; Wenke, M.; Amgalan, A.; Lithen, A.; Govindarajan, S. T.; Makaryus, R.; Benveniste, H.; Strey, H. H.
Show abstract
BackgroundSubstance abuse is a fundamentally dynamic disease, characterized by repeated oscillation between craving, drug self-administration, reward, and satiety. To model nicotine addiction as a control system, an MR-compatible nicotine delivery system is needed to elicit cyclical cravings. MethodUsing a concentric nebulizer, inserted into one nostril, we delivered each dose--each equivalent to a single cigarette puff--using a syringe pump by nebulizing the nicotine solution using pressurized medical air. A control mechanism permits dual modes: one delivers puffs on a fixed interval programmed by researchers; with the other, subjects press a button to self-administer each nicotine dose. Subjects were therefore able to intuitively "smoke" the equivalent of a cigarette, one "puff" at a time. We dosed each "puff" such that one cigarette would be equal, in nicotine content, to 10 puffs. ResultsWe tested the viability of this delivery method for studying the brains response to nicotine addiction in three steps. First, we established the pharmacokinetics of nicotine delivery, using a dosing scheme designed to gradually achieve saturation, as with a cigarette. Second, we lengthened the time between micro-doses to elicit craving cycles, using both fixed-interval and subject-driven behavior. Finally, we confirmed that the fixed-interval protocol reliably activates brain circuits linked to addiction. ConclusionOur MR-compatible nasal delivery method enables the measurement of neural circuit responses to drug doses on a single-subject level, allowing the development of data-driven predictive models to quantify individual dysregulations of the reward control circuit causing addiction.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- LIBR Methamphetamine and Opioid Cue Database (LIBR MOCD): Development and Validation 94%
- Cue-Induced Craving and Negative Emotion Disrupt Response Inhibition in Methamphetamine Use Disorder: Behavioral and fMRI Results from a Mixed Go/No-Go Task 93%
- Brain Network Segregation is Associated with Drug Use Severity in Individuals with Opioid Use Disorder 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- It is Never as Good the Second Time Around: Brain Areas Involved in Salience Processing Habituate During Repeated Drug Cue Exposure in Methamphetamine and Opioid Users 94%
- Striatal dopamine supports reward reactivity and learning: A simultaneous PET/fMRI study 93%
- Intrinsic, dynamic and effective connectivity among large-scale brain networks modulated by oxytocin 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dose-dependent changes in global brain activity and functional connectivity following exposure to psilocybin: a BOLD MRI study in awake rats. 94%
- Early Stopping in Experimentation with Real-time Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using a Modified Sequential Probability Ratio Test 91%
- Non-linear functional brain co-activations in short-term memory distortion tasks 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Thalamic volume and functional connectivity are associated with nicotine dependence severity and craving 94%
- Daily and Intermittent Smoking Decrease Gray Matter Volume and Concentrations of Glutamate, Creatine, Myo-Inositol and N-acetylaspartate in the Prefrontal Cortex 93%
- Rapid appearance of negative emotion during oral fentanyl self-administration in male and female rats 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Opioid antagonism reduces wanting by strengthening frontostriatal connectivity 93%
- Evidence for absence of links between striatal dopamine synthesis capacity and working memory capacity, spontaneous eye-blink rate, and trait impulsivity 93%
- A robust brain network for sustained attention from adolescence to adulthood that predicts later substance use 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.