Restricted constrictors: Space use and habitat selection of native Burmese pythons in Northeast Thailand
Smith, S. N.; Jones, M. D.; Marshall, B. M.; Waengsothorn, S.; Gale, G. A.; Strine, C. T.
Show abstract
Animal movement and resource use are tightly linked. Investigating these links to understand how animals utilize space and select habitats is especially relevant in areas that have been affected by habitat fragmentation and agricultural conversion. We set out to explore the space use and habitat selection of Burmese pythons (Python bivittatus) in a patchy land use matrix dominated by agricultural crops and human settlements. We used radio telemetry to record daily locations of seven Burmese pythons over the course of our study period of approximately 22 months. We created dynamic Brownian Bridge Movement Models (dBBMMs) for all individuals, using occurrence distributions to estimate extent of movements and motion variance to reveal temporal patterns. Then we used integrated step selection functions to determine whether individual movements were associated with particular landscape features (aquatic agriculture, forest, roads, settlements, terrestrial agriculture, water), and whether there were consistent associations at the population level. Our dBBMM estimates suggested that Burmese pythons made use of small areas (98.97 {+/-} 35.42 ha), with low mean individual motion variance characterized by infrequent moves and long periods at a single location. At both the individual and population level, Burmese pythons in the agricultural matrix were associated with aquatic environments. Only one individual showed a strong avoidance for human settlements which is troublesome from a human-wildlife conflict angle, especially as Burmese pythons have been observed entering human settlements and consuming livestock in our study site. Our study is one of the first to contribute to the knowledge of Burmese python ecology in their native range as the majority of studies have focused on invasive populations.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- How do King Cobras move across a major highway? Unintentional wildlife crossing structures may facilitate movement. 98%
- A seasonal pulse of ungulate neonates influences space use by carnivores in a multi-predator, multi-prey system 94%
- Both environmental conditions and intra- and interspecific interactions influence the movements of a marine predator 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Terrain ruggedness and human activities influence the distribution of Grauer's gorillas (Gorilla beringei graueri) and eastern chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) in the Tayna Nature Reserve, Democratic Republic of Congo 96%
- Guidelines for evaluating the success of large carnivore reintroductions 94%
- Integrating opportunistic and structured non-invasive surveys with spatial capture-recapture models to map connectivity of the Pyrenean brown bear population 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Between a rock and a hard place: Effects of land-use change on rock-dwelling animals of lateritic plateaus in the northern Western Ghats 95%
- Spatial behaviors and seasonal habitat use of the increasingly endangered thick-billed parrot (Rhynchopsitta pachyrhyncha) 94%
- Far-reaching displacement effects of artificial light at night in a North American bat community 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.