Back

Quantitative Molecular Imaging of Breast Microcalcification Composition using Photon-Counting Spectral Computed Tomography

Curtis, T. E.; Roeder, R. K.

2020-09-18 bioengineering
10.1101/2020.09.16.300509 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mammographic screening for breast cancer is unable to distinguish molecular differences between hydroxyapatite (HA) microcalcifications (cals) that are associated with malignancy and calcium oxalate (CaOx) cals that are benign. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate quantitative material decomposition of model breast cals of clinically-relevant composition and size using spectral photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT). Model cals composed of HA, CaOx, and dicalcium phosphate (DCP) were treated as materials containing spatially coincident elemental compositions of calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), and oxygen (O). Elemental decomposition was performed using constrained maximum-likelihood estimation in the image domain. Images were acquired with a commercial, preclinical PCCT system (MARS Bioimaging) with five energy bins selected to maximize counts at low photon energies and spectral differences between Ca and P. Elemental concentrations of Ca and P within the each cal composition were accurately identified and quantified with a root-mean-squared error < 12%. HA and CaOx cals, < 1 mm is size, were accurately discriminated by the measured P content with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) > 0.9. The mole fraction of P, P/(Ca+P), was able to discriminate all three cal compositions with AUC > 0.8 for cals < 1 mm is size and AUC = 1 for cals > 2 mm in size. The overall accuracy for the classification of cal types and quantification of P was robust against different assumptions in the elemental decomposition calibration, but quantification of Ca was improved with assumptions that most accurately accounted for the molar volume of each element within cal compositions. Thus, PCCT enabled quantitative molecular imaging of breast cal composition, which is not possible with current clinical molecular imaging modalities.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.