Back

Impairment in O-acetylserine-(thiol) lyase A and B, but not C, confers higher selenate sensitivity and uncovers role for A, B and C as L-Cys and L-SeCys desulfhydrases in Arabidopsis

Sagi, M.; Kurmanbayeva, A.; Bekturova, A.; Soltabayeva, A.; Srivastava, S.; Oshanova, D.; Nurbekova, Z.

2020-09-17 biochemistry
10.1101/2020.09.16.300020 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The role of the cytosolic O-acetylserine-(thiol) lyase A (OASTLA), chloroplastic OASTLB and mitochondrion OASTLC in plant resistance/sensitivity to selenate was studied in Arabidopsis plants. Impairment in OASTLA and B resulted in reduced biomass, chlorophyll and soluble protein levels compared with impaired OASTL C and Wild-Type treated with selenate. The lower organic-Se and protein-Se levels followed by decreased organic-S, S in proteins and total glutathione in oastlA and oastlB compared to Wild-Type and oastlC are indicative that Se accumulation is not the main cause for the stress symptoms, but rather the interference of Se with the S-reduction pathway. The increase in sulfite oxidase, adenosine 5'-phosphosulfate reductase, sulfite reductase and OASTL activity levels, followed by enhanced sulfite and sulfide, indicate a futile anabolic S-starvation response to selenate-induced organic-S catabolism in oastlA and oastlB compared to Wild-Type and oastlC. Additionally, the catabolic pathway of L-cysteine degradation was enhanced by selenate, and similar to L-cysteine producing activity, oastlA and B exhibited a significant decrease in L-cysteine desulfhydrase (DES) activity, compared with WT, indicating a major role of OASTLs in L-cysteine degradation. This notion was further evidenced by sulfide dependent DES in-gel activity, immunoblotting, immunoprecipitation with specific antibodies and identification of unique peptides in activity bands generated by OASTLA, B and C. Similar responses of the OASTLs in Seleno-Cysteine degradation was demonstrated in selenate stressed plants. Notably, no L-cysteine and L-Seleno-Cysteine DES activity bands but those related to OASTLs were evident. These results indicate the significance of OASTLs in degrading L-cysteine and L-SelenoCysteine in Arabidopsis. SummaryThe cytosolic OASTLA and chloroplastic OASTLB have significantly higher desulfhydrase activity rates than the cytosolic DES1 and are able to degrade L-Cys and L-SeCys to sulfide and selenide, respectively in Arabidopsis.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
2
Plant Science
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.3%
3
Metallomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
4
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.5%
5
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.5%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Antioxidants
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
8
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
9
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
10
Physiologia Plantarum
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.9%
12
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
13
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Free Radical Biology and Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Journal of Hazardous Materials
19 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
18
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
20
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
21
Plant and Cell Physiology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
22
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Redox Biology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
25
Journal of Proteomics
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
26
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
28
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
29
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.5%
30
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%