Contrasting impacts of urban and farmland cover on flying insect biomass
Svenningsen, C. S.; Bowler, D. E.; Hecker, S.; Bladt, J.; Grescho, V.; van Dam, N. M.; Dauber, J.; Eichenberg, D.; Ejrnaes, R.; Flojgaard, C.; Frenzel, M.; Froslev, T. G.; Hansen, A. J.; Heilmann-Clausen, J.; Huang, Y.; Larsen, J. C.; Menger, J.; Nayan, N. L. B. M.; Pedersen, L. B.; Richter, A.; Dunn, R. R.; Tottrup, A. P.; Bonn, A.
Show abstract
Recent studies report declines in biomass, abundance and diversity of terrestrial insect groups. While anthropogenic land use is one likely contributor to this decline, studies assessing land cover as a driver of insect dynamics are rare and mostly restricted in spatial scale and types of land cover. In this study, we used rooftop-mounted car nets in a citizen science project ( InsectMobile) to allow for large-scale geographic sampling of flying insects across Denmark and parts of Germany. Citizen scientists sampled insects along 278 10 km routes in urban, farmland and semi-natural (grassland, wetland and forest) landscapes in the summer of 2018. We assessed the importance of local to landscape-scale effects and land use intensity by relating insect biomass to land cover in buffers of 50, 250, 500 and 1000 m along the routes. We found a negative association of urban cover and a positive association of farmland on insect biomass at a landscape-scale (1000 m buffer) in both countries. In Denmark, we also found positive effects of all semi-natural land covers, i.e. grassland (largest at the landscape-scale, 1000 m), forests (largest at intermediate scales, 250 m), and wetlands (largest at the local-scale, 50 m). The negative association of insect biomass with urban land cover and positive association with farmland were not clearly modified by any variable associated with land use intensity. Our results show that land cover has an impact on flying insect biomass with the magnitude of this effect varying across spatial scales. Since we consistently found negative effects of urban land cover, our findings highlight the need for the conservation of semi-natural areas, such as wetlands, grasslands and forests, in Europe.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Field margins as substitute habitat for the conservation of birds in agricultural wetlands 94%
- Spatio-temporal dynamics of attacks around deaths of wolves: A statistical assessment of lethal control efficiency in France 93%
- Conservation networks do not match the ecological requirements of amphibians 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A globally influential area-condition metric is a poor proxy for invertebrate biodiversity 94%
- City climate and landscape structure shape pollinators, nectar and transported pollen along a gradient of urbanization 94%
- Impacts of agrochemical intensification on the assembly and reassembly of a mainland-island model metacommunity 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Temperature drives variation in flying insect biomass across a German malaise trap network 97%
- Five years of citizen science and standardized field surveys reveal a threatened urban Eden for wild bees in Brussels, Belgium 93%
- Nest aggregations of wild bees and apoid wasps in urban pavements: a street life to be promoted in urban planning 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.