Ranking the relative importance of COVID-19 immunisation strategies: a survey of expert stakeholders in Canada
Zhao, L.; Ismail, S. J.; Tunis, M. C.
Show abstract
BackgroundIn the face of anticipated limited COVID-19 vaccine supply necessitating the vaccination of certain groups earlier than others, the assessment of values and preferences of stakeholders is an important component of an ethically sound vaccine prioritisation framework. ObjectiveTo establish a preliminary expert stakeholder perspective on the relative importance of pandemic immunisation strategies for different COVID-19 pandemic scenarios at the time of initial COVID-19 vaccine availability. MethodsA survey was conducted by an email process from July 22 to August 14, 2020. Stakeholders included clinical and public health expert groups, provincial and territorial committees and national Indigenous groups, patient and community advocacy representatives and experts, health professional associations, and federal government departments in Canada. Survey results were analysed using descriptive statistics. ResultsOf 156 stakeholders contacted, 74 surveys were completed for a participation rate of 47.4%. During an anticipated period of initial vaccine scarcity for all pandemic scenarios, stakeholders generally considered the most important immunisation strategy to be protecting those who are most vulnerable to severe illness and death from COVID-19. This was followed in importance by the strategies to protect healthcare capacity, and to minimise transmission of COVID-19. In this supply constrained context, an immunisation strategy to protect critical infrastructure was considered the least important. ConclusionThe findings of this study provide a timely, preliminary Canadian expert perspective on priority COVID-19 pandemic immunisation strategies to guide early public health planning for an eventual COVID-19 immunisation program. These results fill a gap in the literature and could help advisory groups around the world in their assessment of values and preferences for ethical guidelines for COVID-19 vaccine allocation.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Public opinion on global distribution of COVID-19 vaccines: evidence from two nationally representative surveys in Germany and the United States 94%
- A “step too far” or “perfect sense”? A qualitative study of British adults’ views on mandating COVID-19 vaccination and vaccine passports 94%
- Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the provision of routine childhood immunizations in Ontario, Canada 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and refusal and associated factors in an adult population in Saskatchewan, Canada: Evidence from predictive modelling 95%
- COVID-19 vaccination beliefs, attitudes, and behaviours among health and social care workers in the UK: a mixed-methods study 95%
- COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy among Marginalized Populations in the U.S. and Canada: Protocol for a Scoping Review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Essential Workers’ COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy, Misinformation and Informational Needs in the Republic of North Macedonia 95%
- COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in diverse groups in the UK - is the driver economic or cultural in student populations? 95%
- The Societal Value of Vaccines: Expert-Based Conceptual Framework and Methods Using COVID-19 Vaccines as A Case Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Attitudes towards vaccines and intention to vaccinate against COVID-19: Implications for public health communications in Australia 95%
- Understanding national trends in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Canada – April 2020 to March 2021 95%
- Healthcare workers’ perceptions and attitudes towards the UK’s COVID-19 vaccination programme 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 Vaccine Perceptions And Differences By Sex, Age, And Education: Findings From A Cross-Sectional Assessment Of 1367 Community Adults In Ontario 94%
- Vaccine Confidence and Hesitancy at the start of COVID-19 vaccine deployment in the UK: An embedded mixed-methods study 94%
- Determinants of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Engagement in Algeria: A Population-based Study with Systematic Review of Studies from Arab Countries of the MENA Region 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.