Back

Mpl is activated by dimers of MPN-linked calreticulin mutants stabilized by disulfide bonds and ionic interactions

Venkatesan, A.; Geng, J.; Kandarpa, M.; Wijeyesakere, S.; Bhide, A.; Talpaz, M.; Pogozheva, I. D.; Raghavan, M.

2020-09-13 cancer biology
10.1101/2020.09.13.295485 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are frequently driven by insertions and deletions within the gene encoding calreticulin (CRT). CRTDel52 and CRTIns5 are recurrent mutations. Although oncogenic transformation requires both mutated CRT and the myeloproliferative leukemia protein (Mpl), the molecular mechanism of CRT-mediated constitutive activation of Mpl is unknown. Our studies reveal that the novel C-domain of CRTDel52 encodes specificity both for Mpl binding and for disulfide-mediated CRT dimerization. Disulfide-stabilized CRTDel52 dimers and multimers are observed in MPN patient-derived platelet lysates and in transfected mammalian cells. Cysteine mutations within both the novel C-domain (C400A and C404A) and the conserved N-domain (C163A) of CRTDel52 are required to reduce disulfide-mediated dimers and multimers of CRTDel52. Based on these data and published structures of crystalized CRT oligomers, we tested the relevance of ionic interactions between charged residues proximal to C163 at the N-domain dimerization interface. Charge alteration at these residues affected dimerization and multimerization of both wild type and CRTDel52. Elimination of intermolecular disulfides and disruption of ionic interactions at both proposed dimerization interfaces was required to abrogate the ability of CRTDel52 to induce cytokine-independent cell proliferation via Mpl. Based on these findings, we propose a structural model of the Mpl-activating CRTDel52 unit as a covalently-linked dimer that is stabilized by disulfides and ionic interactions at both the C-domain and N-domain. MPNs exploit a natural dimerization interface of CRT combined with C-domain gain-of-functions to achieve cell transformation.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.