Estimates of outbreak-specific SARS-CoV-2 epidemiological parameters from genomic data
Vaughan, T. G.; Scire, J.; Nadeau, S. A.; Stadler, T.
Show abstract
We estimate the basic reproductive number and case counts for 15 distinct SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks, distributed across 10 countries and one cruise ship, based solely on phylodynamic analyses of genomic data. Our results indicate that, prior to significant public health interventions, the reproductive numbers for a majority (10) of these outbreaks are similar, with median posterior estimates ranging between 1.4 and 2.8. These estimates provide a view which is complementary to that provided by those based on traditional line listing data. The genomic-based view is arguably less susceptible to biases resulting from differences in testing protocols, testing intensity, and import of cases into the community of interest. In the analyses reported here, the genomic data primarily provides information regarding which samples belong to a particular outbreak. We observe that once these outbreaks are identified, the sampling dates carry the majority of the information regarding the reproductive number. Finally, we provide genome-based estimates of the cumulative case counts for each outbreak, which allow us to speculate on the amount of unreported infections within the populations housing each outbreak. These results indicate that for the majority (7) of the populations studied, the number of recorded cases is much bigger than the estimated cumulative case counts, suggesting the presence of unsequenced pathogen diversity in these populations. Significance StatementSince the beginning of the COVID-19 outbreak in late 2019, researchers around the globe have sought to estimate the rate at which the disease spread through populations prior to public health intervention, as quantified by the parameter R0. This is often estimated based on case count data and may be biased due to the presence of import cases. To overcome this, we estimate R0 by applying Bayesian phylodynamic methods to SARS-CoV-2 genomes which have been made available by laboratories worldwide. We provide R0 and absolute infection count estimates for 15 distinct outbreaks. These estimates contribute to our understanding of the baseline transmission dynamics of the disease, which will be critical in guiding future public health responses to the pandemic.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Fitness models provide accurate short-term forecasts of SARS-CoV-2 variant frequency 93%
- Estimating cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 with imperfect serological tests: a cutoff-free approach 93%
- Using Test Positivity and Reported Case Rates to Estimate State-Level COVID-19 Prevalence and Seroprevalence in the United States 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating the generation time for SARS-CoV-2 transmission using household data in the United States, December 2021 - May 2023 92%
- A model for COVID-19 transmission in Connecticut 91%
- Genetic determination of regional connectivity in modelling the spread of COVID-19 outbreak for improved mitigation strategies 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.