Improved mTBI outcomes with a BCI Amplified CRT Training: A retrospective chart review
Cripe, C. T.; Mikulecky, P.; Cooper, R.; Eagan, T.
Show abstract
This study is a retrospective chart review of 200 clients who participated in a non-verbal restorative Cognitive Remediation Training (rCRT) program. The program was applied to effect proper neural functional remodeling needed to support resilient, flexible and adaptable behaviors after encountering a mild to medium closed head traumatic brain injury (mTBI). The r CRT training program focused on improving functional performance in executive cognitive control networks as defined by fMRI studies. All rCRT training activities were delivered in a semi-game-like manner, incorporating a Brain Computer Interface (BCI) that provided in-the-moment neural network performance integrity metrics (nPIMs) used to adjust the level of play required to properly engage long-term potentiation (LTP) and long term depreciation (LTD) network learning rules. This study reports on t-test and Reliable Change Index (RCI) changes found within cognitive abilities performance metrics derived from the Woodcock Johnson Cognitive Abilities III Test. We compared pre and post scores from seven cognitive abilities considered dependent on executive cognitive control networks against seven non-executive control abilities. We observed significant improvements (p values 10 to 10-22) with large Cohens d effect sizes (0.78-1.20) across thirteen cognitive ability domains with a medium effect size (.49) on the remaining. The mean percent change for pooled trained domain was double that observed for pooled untrained domain, at 17.2% versus 8.3%, respectively. To further adjust for practice effects, practice effect RCI values were computed and further supported the effectiveness of the rCRT training (RCI-trained 1.4 - 4.8; untrained RCI 0.08-0.75).
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of bilateral and unilateral mental practice on actual motor performance and event-related desynchronization 94%
- Expanding Capabilities to Evaluate Readiness for Return to Duty after mTBI: The CAMP Study Protocol 93%
- Feasibility of Remotely Supervised Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Cognitive Remediation: A Systematic Review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Abnormal Functional Network Topology and its Dynamics during Sustained Attention Processing Significantly Implicate Post-TBI Attention Deficits in Children 93%
- Reliability and Validity of Cognitive Workload in Older Adults 91%
- In-phase bilateral upper limb exercises improve cognitive and motor function in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A pilot randomized controlled trial 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Upper Limb Motor Improvement after TBI: Systematic Review of Interventions 94%
- Predictors of arm non-use in chronic stroke: a preliminary investigation 93%
- Comparing a novel neuroanimation experience to conventional therapy for high-dose, intensive upper-limb training in subacute stroke: The SMARTS2 randomized trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Motivational Strategies for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study 94%
- Impaired everyday executive functions and cognitive strategy use on the Weekly Calendar Planning Activity in individuals with stroke undergoing acute inpatient rehabilitation 93%
- Rasch validation of a new scale to measure dependency in arm use in daily life: the Upper Limb Lucerne ICF-based Multidisciplinary Observation Scale (UL-LIMOS) 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Characterization of cognitive-motor function in women who have experienced intimate partner violence-related brain injury 92%
- Comparison of common outcome measures for assessing independence in patients diagnosed with disorders of consciousness: A Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Study 91%
- Objective turning measures improve diagnostic accuracy and relate to real-world mobility/combat readiness in chronic mild traumatic brain injury 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.