Back

Transcriptional reprogramming during effector/flg22-triggered immune is independent of defense phytohormone signaling networks

Zhang, N.; Fan, Z.

2020-09-11 bioinformatics
10.1101/2020.09.09.289629 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Plants rely on the innate immune system to sense and respond to a wide range of lifestyle pathogens and to facilitate their survival in natural ecosystems. Pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMP)-triggered immunity (PTI) and effector-triggered immunity (ETI) are designated as a two-branched system of innate immunity. Although PTI/ETI share a series of downstream molecular events, systematic analysis of convergent and divergent signaling in PTI/ETI is currently lacking. The phytohormones salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA) are considered to constitute the hormonal backbone of plant immunity, are functionally antagonistic, and play essential roles in defending against biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens, respectively. However, the distinct performance of two phytohormones in PTI/ETI remains unclear. Here, we systemically investigate and validate the reprogramming of molecular networks during PTI and ETI. Using publicly available Arabidopsis RNA sequence data from 560 samples, we construct a co-expression network under Mock conditions and then explore the differential expression/co-expression changes during PTI, ETI, and Pto DC3000 infection. During PTI and ETI, one-third of genes in the Arabidopsis genome exhibit the same directional differential expression in a manner independent of JA/ethylene/PAD4/SA signaling but show differential co-expression patterns. However, the defense phytohormone network is required for defense against Pto DC3000 infection. We also exhibit the use of this network in prioritizing genes that functioned closely with the proteins directly targeted by elicitors. Overall, this study will deepen our understanding of plant transcriptome in plant immunity and provide new insights into the mode of action of elicitors.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Plant
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.4%
2
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.0%
3
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.3%
4
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.8%
5
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
7
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
8
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
9
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.1%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 36%
2.1%
11
Plant and Cell Physiology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
13
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.8%
15
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.5%
17
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.3%
18
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
19
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
20
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
21
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
22
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
23
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.9%
24
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
25
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
55 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
28
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.6%