Back

Targeting Neuroplasticity to Improve Motor Recovery after Stroke

Norman, S. L.; Wolpaw, J. R.; Reinkensmeyer, D. J.

2020-09-09 neuroscience
10.1101/2020.09.09.284620 bioRxiv
Show abstract

After neurological injury, people develop abnormal patterns of neural activity that limit motor recovery. Traditional rehabilitation, which concentrates on practicing impaired skills, is seldom fully effective. New targeted neuroplasticity (TNP) protocols interact with the CNS to induce beneficial plasticity in key sites and thereby enable wider beneficial plasticity. They can complement traditional therapy and enhance recovery. However, their development and validation is difficult because many different TNP protocols are conceivable, and evaluating even one of them is lengthy, laborious, and expensive. Computational models can address this problem by triaging numerous candidate protocols rapidly and effectively. Animal and human empirical testing can then concentrate on the most promising ones. Here we simulate a neural network of corticospinal neurons that control motoneurons eliciting unilateral finger extension. We use this network to (1) study the mechanisms and patterns of cortical reorganization after a stroke, and (2) identify and parameterize a TNP protocol that improves recovery of extension force. After a simulated stroke, standard training produced abnormal bilateral cortical activation and suboptimal force recovery. To enhance recovery, we interdigitated standard trials with trials in which the teaching signal came from a targeted population of sub-optimized neurons. Targeting neurons in secondary motor areas on 5-20% of the total trials restored lateralized cortical activation and improved recovery of extension force. The results illuminate mechanisms underlying suboptimal cortical activity post-stroke; they enable identification and parameterization of the most promising TNP protocols. By providing initial guidance, computational models could facilitate and accelerate realization of new therapies that improve motor recovery.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.